|
|
|
|
| LEADER |
01000naa a22002652 4500 |
| 001 |
NLM293801096 |
| 003 |
DE-627 |
| 005 |
20231225080112.0 |
| 007 |
cr uuu---uuuuu |
| 008 |
231225s2010 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c |
| 024 |
7 |
|
|a 10.1094/PDIS-94-1-0132C
|2 doi
|
| 028 |
5 |
2 |
|a pubmed24n0979.xml
|
| 035 |
|
|
|a (DE-627)NLM293801096
|
| 035 |
|
|
|a (NLM)30754416
|
| 040 |
|
|
|a DE-627
|b ger
|c DE-627
|e rakwb
|
| 041 |
|
|
|a eng
|
| 100 |
1 |
|
|a Wechter, W P
|e verfasserin
|4 aut
|
| 245 |
1 |
0 |
|a First Report of Bacterial Leaf Blight on Broccoli and Cabbage Caused by Pseudomonas syringae pv. alisalensis in South Carolina
|
| 264 |
|
1 |
|c 2010
|
| 336 |
|
|
|a Text
|b txt
|2 rdacontent
|
| 337 |
|
|
|a ƒaComputermedien
|b c
|2 rdamedia
|
| 338 |
|
|
|a ƒa Online-Ressource
|b cr
|2 rdacarrier
|
| 500 |
|
|
|a Date Revised 20.11.2019
|
| 500 |
|
|
|a published: Print
|
| 500 |
|
|
|a Citation Status PubMed-not-MEDLINE
|
| 520 |
|
|
|a In May of 2009, leaf spot and leaf blight symptoms were observed on broccoli (Brassica oleracea var. italica) and cabbage (B. oleracea var. capitata) on several farms in Lexington County, the major brassica-growing region of South Carolina. Affected areas ranged from scattered disease foci within fields to entire fields. Initial infection symptoms on leaves of both crops included circular and irregular-shaped necrotic lesions that were 3 to 10 mm in diameter, often with yellow halos and water soaking. As the disease progressed, the lesions tended to coalesce into a general blight of the entire leaf. Diseased leaves from both broccoli and cabbage were collected from each of four fields at different locations in the county. Leaves were surface disinfested, macerated in sterile distilled water, then aliquots of the suspension were spread on King's medium B (KB) agar. All samples produced large numbers of bacterial colonies that fluoresced blue under UV light after 24 h of growth. In total, 23 isolates (13 from broccoli and 10 from cabbage) were collected. These isolates were gram negative, levan production positive, oxidase negative, pectolytic activity negative, arginine dihydrolase negative, and produced a hypersensitive response on tobacco, thus placing them in the Pseudomonas syringae LOPAT group (2). Two broccoli and two cabbage isolates were selected at random and tested for pathogenicity to cabbage cv. Early Jersey Wakefield, broccoli cv. Decicco, turnip cv. Topper, broccoli raab cv. Spring, collard cv. Hi-Crop, and oat cv. Montezuma in greenhouse tests. Bacteria were grown on KB agar for 24 h and a bacterial suspension was prepared and adjusted to an optical density of 0.1 at 600 nm. Three-week-old plants were spray inoculated to runoff and held at 100% relative humidity for 12 h after inoculation, prior to return to the greenhouse bench (4). P. syringae pv. maculicola strain F18 (4) and the pathotype strain of P. syringae pv. alisalensis BS91 were included as controls, along with a water-inoculated negative control. Plants were evaluated at 14 days postinoculation. The four unknown bacterial isolates and BS91 were pathogenic on all brassica plants tested, as well as on oat. In contrast, the P. syringae pv. maculicola strain F18 was not pathogenic on broccoli raab or oat. Symptoms produced by all isolates and strains tested were similar to those observed in the field. No symptoms were observed on water-inoculated plants. Comparative repetitive sequence-based (rep)-PCR DNA analysis using the BOXA1R primer (3) resulted in a DNA banding pattern of each of the isolates from the South Carolina fields (23 isolates), as well as those reisolated from inoculated plants, that was identical to P. syringae pv. alisalensis BS91 and differed from the P. syringae pv. maculicola F18 strain. On the basis of the rep-PCR assays and the differential host range (1), the current disease outbreak on broccoli and cabbage in South Carolina is caused by the bacterium P. syringae pv. alisalensis. Broccoli is a relatively new, albeit rapidly expanding, production vegetable in South Carolina; this disease may represent a limiting factor to future production. References: (1) N. A. Cintas et al. Plant Dis. 86:992, 2002. (2) R. A. Lelliott et al. J. Appl. Bacteriol. 29:470, 1966. (3) J. Versalovic et al. Methods Mol. Cell. Biol. 5:25, 1994. (4) Y. F. Zhao et al. Plant Dis. 84:1015, 2000
|
| 650 |
|
4 |
|a Journal Article
|
| 700 |
1 |
|
|a Keinath, A P
|e verfasserin
|4 aut
|
| 700 |
1 |
|
|a Farnham, M W
|e verfasserin
|4 aut
|
| 700 |
1 |
|
|a Smith, J P
|e verfasserin
|4 aut
|
| 773 |
0 |
8 |
|i Enthalten in
|t Plant disease
|d 1997
|g 94(2010), 1 vom: 13. Jan., Seite 132
|w (DE-627)NLM098181742
|x 0191-2917
|7 nnns
|
| 773 |
1 |
8 |
|g volume:94
|g year:2010
|g number:1
|g day:13
|g month:01
|g pages:132
|
| 856 |
4 |
0 |
|u http://dx.doi.org/10.1094/PDIS-94-1-0132C
|3 Volltext
|
| 912 |
|
|
|a GBV_USEFLAG_A
|
| 912 |
|
|
|a SYSFLAG_A
|
| 912 |
|
|
|a GBV_NLM
|
| 912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_350
|
| 951 |
|
|
|a AR
|
| 952 |
|
|
|d 94
|j 2010
|e 1
|b 13
|c 01
|h 132
|