|
|
|
|
| LEADER |
01000naa a22002652 4500 |
| 001 |
NLM293800278 |
| 003 |
DE-627 |
| 005 |
20231225080111.0 |
| 007 |
cr uuu---uuuuu |
| 008 |
231225s2010 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c |
| 024 |
7 |
|
|a 10.1094/PDIS-94-6-0789A
|2 doi
|
| 028 |
5 |
2 |
|a pubmed24n0979.xml
|
| 035 |
|
|
|a (DE-627)NLM293800278
|
| 035 |
|
|
|a (NLM)30754333
|
| 040 |
|
|
|a DE-627
|b ger
|c DE-627
|e rakwb
|
| 041 |
|
|
|a eng
|
| 100 |
1 |
|
|a Mathew, F M
|e verfasserin
|4 aut
|
| 245 |
1 |
0 |
|a First Report of Ascochyta Blight of Field Pea Caused by Ascochyta pisi in South Dakota
|
| 264 |
|
1 |
|c 2010
|
| 336 |
|
|
|a Text
|b txt
|2 rdacontent
|
| 337 |
|
|
|a ƒaComputermedien
|b c
|2 rdamedia
|
| 338 |
|
|
|a ƒa Online-Ressource
|b cr
|2 rdacarrier
|
| 500 |
|
|
|a Date Revised 20.11.2019
|
| 500 |
|
|
|a published: Print
|
| 500 |
|
|
|a Citation Status PubMed-not-MEDLINE
|
| 520 |
|
|
|a Tan lesions approximately 1.7 × 0.8 cm with distinct dark brown margins and small pycnidia were observed on leaves of field peas (Pisum sativum L. 'Agassiz') growing in Campbell County, South Dakota (45°45.62'N, 100°9.13'W) in July 2008. Small pieces of symptomatic leaves were surface sterilized (10% NaOCl for 1 min, 70% EtOH for 1 min, and sterile distilled H2O for 2 min) and placed on potato dextrose agar (PDA) for 7 days under fluorescent lights with a 12-h photoperiod to induce sporulation. A pure culture was established by streaking a conidial suspension on PDA and isolating a single germinated spore 3 days later. The culture was grown on clarified V8 media for 10 days. Conidia were 10 to 16 × 3 to 4.5 μm and uniseptate with a slightly constricted septum, similar to those of Ascochyta pisi Lib. The exuding spore mass from pycnidia growing on the medium was carrot red. No chlamydospores or pseudothecia were observed (1,2). To confirm the identity of A. pisi, DNA was extracted from the lyophilized mycelium of the 10-day-old culture with the DNeasy Plant Mini Kit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA). Internal transcribed spacer (ITS) regions I and II were amplified with PCR primers ITS 5 and ITS 4 (3). PCR amplicons were cleaned and directly sequenced in both directions using the primers. A BLASTN search against the NCBI nonredundant nucleotide database was performed using the consensus sequence generated by alignment of the forward and reverse sequences for this region. The consensus sequence (GenBank Accession No. GU722316) most closely matched A. pisi var. pisi strain (GenBank Accession No. EU167557). These observations confirm the identity of the fungus as A. pisi. A suspension of 1 × 106 conidia/ml of the isolate was spray inoculated to runoff on 10 replicate plants of 2-week-old, susceptible green field pea 'Sterling'. Plants were incubated in a dew chamber for 48 h at 18°C and moved to the greenhouse bench where they were maintained at 20 to 25°C with a 12-h photoperiod for 1 week. Tan lesions with dark margins appeared 7 days after inoculation and disease was assessed after 10 days (4). No symptoms were observed on water-treated control plants. A. pisi was reisolated from lesions and confirmed by DNA sequencing of the ITS region, fulfilling Koch's postulates. Currently, states bordering South Dakota (North Dakota and Montana) lead the United States in field pea production. Although acreage is limited in South Dakota, the identification of A. pisi in this region is serious. The disease is yield limiting and foliar fungicides are used for disease management (1). To our knowledge, this is the first report of Ascochyta blight on P. sativum caused by A. pisi occurring in South Dakota and the MonDak production region (the Dakotas and Montana). References: (1) T. W. Bretag et al. Aust. J. Agric. Res. 57:88, 2006. (2) A. S. Lawyer. Page 11 in: The Compendium of Pea Diseases. D. J. Hagedorn, ed. The American Phytopathological Society, St Paul, MN, 1984. (3) T. J. White et al. Page 315 in: PCR Protocols: A Guide to Methods and Applications. M. A. Innis et al., eds. Academic Press, San Diego, 1990. (4) J. M. Wroth. Can. J. Bot. 76:1955, 1998
|
| 650 |
|
4 |
|a Journal Article
|
| 700 |
1 |
|
|a Goswami, R S
|e verfasserin
|4 aut
|
| 700 |
1 |
|
|a Markell, S G
|e verfasserin
|4 aut
|
| 700 |
1 |
|
|a Osborne, L
|e verfasserin
|4 aut
|
| 700 |
1 |
|
|a Tande, C
|e verfasserin
|4 aut
|
| 700 |
1 |
|
|a Ruden, B
|e verfasserin
|4 aut
|
| 773 |
0 |
8 |
|i Enthalten in
|t Plant disease
|d 1997
|g 94(2010), 6 vom: 13. Juni, Seite 789
|w (DE-627)NLM098181742
|x 0191-2917
|7 nnns
|
| 773 |
1 |
8 |
|g volume:94
|g year:2010
|g number:6
|g day:13
|g month:06
|g pages:789
|
| 856 |
4 |
0 |
|u http://dx.doi.org/10.1094/PDIS-94-6-0789A
|3 Volltext
|
| 912 |
|
|
|a GBV_USEFLAG_A
|
| 912 |
|
|
|a SYSFLAG_A
|
| 912 |
|
|
|a GBV_NLM
|
| 912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_350
|
| 951 |
|
|
|a AR
|
| 952 |
|
|
|d 94
|j 2010
|e 6
|b 13
|c 06
|h 789
|