Efficacy of Variable Tetraconazole Rates Against Cercospora beticola Isolates with Differing In Vitro Sensitivities to DMI Fungicides

Cercospora leaf spot (CLS) of sugar beet is caused by the fungus Cercospora beticola. CLS management practices include the application of the sterol demethylation inhibitor (DMI) fungicides tetraconazole, difenoconazole, and prothioconazole. Evaluating resistance to DMIs is a major focus for CLS fun...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Plant disease. - 1997. - 96(2012), 12 vom: 01. Dez., Seite 1749-1756
1. Verfasser: Bolton, Melvin D (VerfasserIn)
Weitere Verfasser: Rivera-Varas, Viviana, Del Río Mendoza, Luis E, Khan, Mohamed F R, Secor, Gary A
Format: Online-Aufsatz
Sprache:English
Veröffentlicht: 2012
Zugriff auf das übergeordnete Werk:Plant disease
Schlagworte:Journal Article
LEADER 01000naa a22002652 4500
001 NLM293533547
003 DE-627
005 20231225075526.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 231225s2012 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1094/PDIS-03-12-0255-RE  |2 doi 
028 5 2 |a pubmed24n0978.xml 
035 |a (DE-627)NLM293533547 
035 |a (NLM)30727253 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rakwb 
041 |a eng 
100 1 |a Bolton, Melvin D  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Efficacy of Variable Tetraconazole Rates Against Cercospora beticola Isolates with Differing In Vitro Sensitivities to DMI Fungicides 
264 1 |c 2012 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a ƒaComputermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a ƒa Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
500 |a Date Revised 20.11.2019 
500 |a published: Print 
500 |a Citation Status PubMed-not-MEDLINE 
520 |a Cercospora leaf spot (CLS) of sugar beet is caused by the fungus Cercospora beticola. CLS management practices include the application of the sterol demethylation inhibitor (DMI) fungicides tetraconazole, difenoconazole, and prothioconazole. Evaluating resistance to DMIs is a major focus for CLS fungicide resistance management. Isolates were collected in 1997 and 1998 (baseline sensitivity to tetraconazole, prothioconazole, or difenoconazole) and 2007 through 2010 from the major sugar-beet-growing regions of Minnesota and North Dakota and assessed for in vitro sensitivity to two or three DMI fungicides. Most (47%) isolates collected in 1997-98 exhibited 50% effective concentration (EC50) values for tetraconazole of <0.01 μg ml-1, whereas no isolates could be found in this EC50 range in 2010. Since 2007, annual median and mean tetraconazole EC50 values have generally been increasing, and the frequency of isolates with EC50 values >0.11 μg ml-1 increased from 2008 to 2010. In contrast, the frequency of isolates with EC50 values for prothioconazole of >1.0 μg ml-1 has been decreasing since 2007. Annual median difenoconazole EC50 values appears to be stable, although annual mean EC50 values generally have been increasing for this fungicide. Although EC50 values are important for gauging fungicide sensitivity trends, a rigorous comparison of the relationship between in vitro EC50 values and loss of fungicide efficacy in planta has not been conducted for C. beticola. To explore this, 12 isolates exhibiting a wide range of tetraconazole EC50 values were inoculated to sugar beet but no tetraconazole was applied. No relationship was found between isolate EC50 value and disease severity. To assess whether EC50 values are related to fungicide efficacy in planta, sugar beet plants were sprayed with various dilutions of Eminent, the commercial formulation of tetraconazole, and subsequently inoculated with isolates that exhibited very low, medium, or high tetraconazole EC50 values. The high EC50 isolate caused significantly more disease than isolates with medium or very low EC50 values at the field application rate and most reduced rates. Because in vitro sensitivity testing is typically carried out with the active ingredient of the commercial fungicide, we investigated whether loss of disease control was the same for tetraconazole as for the commercial product Eminent. The high EC50 isolate caused more disease on plants treated with tetraconazole than Eminent but disease severity was not different between plants inoculated with the very low EC50 isolate 
650 4 |a Journal Article 
700 1 |a Rivera-Varas, Viviana  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Del Río Mendoza, Luis E  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Khan, Mohamed F R  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Secor, Gary A  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Plant disease  |d 1997  |g 96(2012), 12 vom: 01. Dez., Seite 1749-1756  |w (DE-627)NLM098181742  |x 0191-2917  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:96  |g year:2012  |g number:12  |g day:01  |g month:12  |g pages:1749-1756 
856 4 0 |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1094/PDIS-03-12-0255-RE  |3 Volltext 
912 |a GBV_USEFLAG_A 
912 |a SYSFLAG_A 
912 |a GBV_NLM 
912 |a GBV_ILN_350 
951 |a AR 
952 |d 96  |j 2012  |e 12  |b 01  |c 12  |h 1749-1756