Evaluation of Methods to Quantify Populations of Rhizoctonia in Soil

The best method to quantitatively determine populations of Rhizoctonia in soil from soybean fields undergoing rice and soybean rotations was determined for use in a large-scale spatial study to be done over multiple fields and years. The methods evaluated were the toothpick-baiting method, the multi...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Plant disease. - 1997. - 99(2015), 6 vom: 31. Juni, Seite 836-841
1. Verfasser: Spurlock, T N (VerfasserIn)
Weitere Verfasser: Rothrock, C S, Monfort, W S
Format: Online-Aufsatz
Sprache:English
Veröffentlicht: 2015
Zugriff auf das übergeordnete Werk:Plant disease
Schlagworte:Journal Article
LEADER 01000caa a22002652 4500
001 NLM293264988
003 DE-627
005 20250224182200.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 231225s2015 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1094/PDIS-05-14-0446-RE  |2 doi 
028 5 2 |a pubmed25n0977.xml 
035 |a (DE-627)NLM293264988 
035 |a (NLM)30699534 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rakwb 
041 |a eng 
100 1 |a Spurlock, T N  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Evaluation of Methods to Quantify Populations of Rhizoctonia in Soil 
264 1 |c 2015 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a ƒaComputermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a ƒa Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
500 |a Date Revised 20.11.2019 
500 |a published: Print-Electronic 
500 |a Citation Status PubMed-not-MEDLINE 
520 |a The best method to quantitatively determine populations of Rhizoctonia in soil from soybean fields undergoing rice and soybean rotations was determined for use in a large-scale spatial study to be done over multiple fields and years. The methods evaluated were the toothpick-baiting method, the multiple-pellet soil sampler, and the pour-plate method using elutriated organic matter from soil or surface residue. The toothpick-baiting method was calibrated using the multiple-pellet soil sampler and determined to assay an approximate soil volume of 15.43 cm3. The radius of isolation with the toothpick-baiting technique was approximately 1 cm. In 2009 and 2010, the toothpick method was determined to be the most reliable method for assaying soils, with the most isolates across space and greater recovery of Rhizoctonia solani AG1-IA, R. solani AG11, and R. oryzae, the major Rhizoctonia spp. in these fields, when quantified as propagules per volume of soil or organic matter. In 2011, the recovery of these three groups of Rhizoctonia did not differ statistically when the toothpick-baiting method was compared with the multiple-pellet soil sampler after the volume of soil assayed by the pellet sampler was increased to be similar to that of the toothpick method. However, the labor involved in assaying a similar volume of soil with the multiple-pellet soil sampler was limiting for a large-scale spatial study. The toothpick-baiting method was preferred over the other methods because it was determined to be thorough, inexpensive, nondestructive, and rapid. Additionally, the use of the toothpick-baiting method allows for the determination of the depth of inoculum of isolated fungi for intact soil cores. The mean depth of activity of R. solani AG1-IA, R. solani AG11, and R. oryzae was 1.15, 1.55, and 1.47 cm respectively 
650 4 |a Journal Article 
700 1 |a Rothrock, C S  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Monfort, W S  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Plant disease  |d 1997  |g 99(2015), 6 vom: 31. Juni, Seite 836-841  |w (DE-627)NLM098181742  |x 0191-2917  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:99  |g year:2015  |g number:6  |g day:31  |g month:06  |g pages:836-841 
856 4 0 |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1094/PDIS-05-14-0446-RE  |3 Volltext 
912 |a GBV_USEFLAG_A 
912 |a SYSFLAG_A 
912 |a GBV_NLM 
912 |a GBV_ILN_350 
951 |a AR 
952 |d 99  |j 2015  |e 6  |b 31  |c 06  |h 836-841