|
|
|
|
| LEADER |
01000naa a22002652 4500 |
| 001 |
NLM293182655 |
| 003 |
DE-627 |
| 005 |
20231225074747.0 |
| 007 |
cr uuu---uuuuu |
| 008 |
231225s2015 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c |
| 024 |
7 |
|
|a 10.1094/PDIS-10-14-0998-RE
|2 doi
|
| 028 |
5 |
2 |
|a pubmed24n0977.xml
|
| 035 |
|
|
|a (DE-627)NLM293182655
|
| 035 |
|
|
|a (NLM)30690991
|
| 040 |
|
|
|a DE-627
|b ger
|c DE-627
|e rakwb
|
| 041 |
|
|
|a eng
|
| 100 |
1 |
|
|a Strausbaugh, Carl A
|e verfasserin
|4 aut
|
| 245 |
1 |
0 |
|a Influence of Harvest Timing, Fungicides, and Beet necrotic yellow vein virus on Sugar Beet Storage
|
| 264 |
|
1 |
|c 2015
|
| 336 |
|
|
|a Text
|b txt
|2 rdacontent
|
| 337 |
|
|
|a ƒaComputermedien
|b c
|2 rdamedia
|
| 338 |
|
|
|a ƒa Online-Ressource
|b cr
|2 rdacarrier
|
| 500 |
|
|
|a Date Revised 20.11.2019
|
| 500 |
|
|
|a published: Print-Electronic
|
| 500 |
|
|
|a Citation Status PubMed-not-MEDLINE
|
| 520 |
|
|
|a Root rots in sugar beet storage can lead to multimillion dollar losses because of reduced sucrose recovery. Thus, studies were conducted to establish additional fungicide treatments for sugar beet storage and a greater understanding of the fungi involved in the sugar beet storage rot complex in Idaho. A water control treatment and three fungicides (Mertect [product at 0.065 ml/kg of roots; 42.3% thiabendazole {vol/vol}], Propulse [product at 0.049 ml/kg of roots; 17.4% fluopyram and 17.4% prothioconazole {vol/vol}], and Stadium [product at 0.13 ml/kg of roots; 12.51% azoxystrobin, 12.51% fludioxonil, and 9.76% difenoconozole {vol/vol}]) were investigated for the ability to control fungal rots of sugar beet roots held up to 148 days in storage during the 2012 and 2013 storage seasons. At the end of September into October, roots were harvested weekly for 5 weeks from each of two sugar beet fields in Idaho, treated with the appropriate fungicide, and placed on top of a commercial indoor sugar beet storage pile until early February. Differences (P < 0.0001 to 0.0150) among fungicide treatments were evident. Propulse- and Stadium-treated roots had 84 to 100% less fungal growth versus the control roots, whereas fungal growth on Mertect-treated roots was not different from the control roots in 7 of 12 comparisons for roots harvested each of the first 3 weeks in both years of this study. The Propulse- and Stadium-treated roots also reduced (P < 0.0001 to 0.0146; based on weeks 1, 3, and 4 in 2012 and weeks 1, 3, 4, and 5 in 2013) sucrose loss by 14 to 46% versus the control roots, whereas roots treated with Mertect did not change sucrose loss compared with the control roots in 7 of 10 evaluations. The predominant fungi isolated from symptomatic roots were an Athelia-like sp., Botrytis cinerea, Penicillium spp., and Phoma betae. If Propulse and Stadium are labeled for use on sugar beet in storage, these fungicides should be considered for root rot control in commercial sugar beet storage and on roots held for vernalization for seed production of this biennial plant species
|
| 650 |
|
4 |
|a Journal Article
|
| 700 |
1 |
|
|a Neher, Oliver
|e verfasserin
|4 aut
|
| 700 |
1 |
|
|a Rearick, Eugene
|e verfasserin
|4 aut
|
| 700 |
1 |
|
|a Eujayl, Imad A
|e verfasserin
|4 aut
|
| 773 |
0 |
8 |
|i Enthalten in
|t Plant disease
|d 1997
|g 99(2015), 10 vom: 25. Okt., Seite 1296-1309
|w (DE-627)NLM098181742
|x 0191-2917
|7 nnns
|
| 773 |
1 |
8 |
|g volume:99
|g year:2015
|g number:10
|g day:25
|g month:10
|g pages:1296-1309
|
| 856 |
4 |
0 |
|u http://dx.doi.org/10.1094/PDIS-10-14-0998-RE
|3 Volltext
|
| 912 |
|
|
|a GBV_USEFLAG_A
|
| 912 |
|
|
|a SYSFLAG_A
|
| 912 |
|
|
|a GBV_NLM
|
| 912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_350
|
| 951 |
|
|
|a AR
|
| 952 |
|
|
|d 99
|j 2015
|e 10
|b 25
|c 10
|h 1296-1309
|