Comparison of Five Detection and Quantification Methods for Phytophthora ramorum in Stream and Irrigation Water

Propagules of Phytophthora ramorum, the causal agent of sudden oak death (SOD) and ramorum blight, can be recovered from infested stream and nursery irrigation runoff using baiting and filtration methods. Five detection methods, including pear and rhododendron leaf baits, Bottle O' Bait, filtra...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Plant disease. - 1997. - 100(2016), 6 vom: 01. Juni, Seite 1202-1211
1. Verfasser: Rollins, Lucy (VerfasserIn)
Weitere Verfasser: Coats, Katie, Elliott, Marianne, Chastagner, Gary
Format: Online-Aufsatz
Sprache:English
Veröffentlicht: 2016
Zugriff auf das übergeordnete Werk:Plant disease
Schlagworte:Journal Article
LEADER 01000naa a22002652 4500
001 NLM293096244
003 DE-627
005 20231225074550.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 231225s2016 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1094/PDIS-11-15-1380-RE  |2 doi 
028 5 2 |a pubmed24n0976.xml 
035 |a (DE-627)NLM293096244 
035 |a (NLM)30682270 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rakwb 
041 |a eng 
100 1 |a Rollins, Lucy  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Comparison of Five Detection and Quantification Methods for Phytophthora ramorum in Stream and Irrigation Water 
264 1 |c 2016 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a ƒaComputermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a ƒa Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
500 |a Date Revised 20.11.2019 
500 |a published: Print-Electronic 
500 |a Citation Status PubMed-not-MEDLINE 
520 |a Propagules of Phytophthora ramorum, the causal agent of sudden oak death (SOD) and ramorum blight, can be recovered from infested stream and nursery irrigation runoff using baiting and filtration methods. Five detection methods, including pear and rhododendron leaf baits, Bottle O' Bait, filtration, and quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) performed on zoospores trapped on a filter were compared simultaneously in laboratory assays using lab or creek water spiked with known quantities of P. ramorum zoospores. The detection threshold for each method was determined and methods that could be used to quantify zoospore inoculum were identified. Filtration and qPCR were the most sensitive at detecting low levels of zoospores, followed by wounded rhododendron leaves, rhododendron leaf disks, and pear baits. Filtration, qPCR, and leaf disks were able to quantify P. ramorum zoospores ranging from 2 to 451 direct-plate CFU/liter while wounded leaves and pear baits appeared to be better at detection rather than quantification. The ability to detect and quantify P. ramorum inoculum in water will assist scientists, regulatory agencies, and nursery personnel in assessing the risk of spreading P. ramorum in nurseries and landscape sites where untreated infested water is used for irrigation 
650 4 |a Journal Article 
700 1 |a Coats, Katie  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Elliott, Marianne  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Chastagner, Gary  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Plant disease  |d 1997  |g 100(2016), 6 vom: 01. Juni, Seite 1202-1211  |w (DE-627)NLM098181742  |x 0191-2917  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:100  |g year:2016  |g number:6  |g day:01  |g month:06  |g pages:1202-1211 
856 4 0 |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1094/PDIS-11-15-1380-RE  |3 Volltext 
912 |a GBV_USEFLAG_A 
912 |a SYSFLAG_A 
912 |a GBV_NLM 
912 |a GBV_ILN_350 
951 |a AR 
952 |d 100  |j 2016  |e 6  |b 01  |c 06  |h 1202-1211