Sharing conservation burdens fairly

© 2018 Society for Conservation Biology.

Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology. - 1999. - 33(2019), 3 vom: 19. Juni, Seite 554-560
1. Verfasser: Armstrong, Chris (VerfasserIn)
Format: Online-Aufsatz
Sprache:English
Veröffentlicht: 2019
Zugriff auf das übergeordnete Werk:Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology
Schlagworte:Journal Article 保护公平性 a pluralist account ability to pay beneficios benefits conservation justice contribución al problema contribution to the problem distributive justice mehr... habilidad para pagar justicia de conservación justicia distributiva una cuenta pluralista 分配公平性 利益 多元主义解释 对问题的贡献 支付能力
LEADER 01000naa a22002652 4500
001 NLM291991262
003 DE-627
005 20231225072108.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 231225s2019 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1111/cobi.13260  |2 doi 
028 5 2 |a pubmed24n0973.xml 
035 |a (DE-627)NLM291991262 
035 |a (NLM)30569477 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rakwb 
041 |a eng 
100 1 |a Armstrong, Chris  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Sharing conservation burdens fairly 
264 1 |c 2019 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a ƒaComputermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a ƒa Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
500 |a Date Completed 11.12.2019 
500 |a Date Revised 17.12.2019 
500 |a published: Print-Electronic 
500 |a Citation Status MEDLINE 
520 |a © 2018 Society for Conservation Biology. 
520 |a We examined how, from the point of view of justice, the burdens of paying for conservation should be shared. I resisted simple answers to the question of who should pay for conservation that lean on a single moral principle. I identified 3 relevant principles that relate to who causes conservation challenges, who has greater capacity to carry burdens, and who stands to benefit from conservation. I argue for a distinctive pluralist framework for allocating conservation burdens that grants a proper role to all 3 principles. A multistep process can be used to put the framework into practice. First, identify cases in which conservation is necessary. Second, consider whether people knew or could have been expected to anticipate the consequences of their activities and whether they had reasonable alternatives to acting the way they did. Third, turn to facts about benefits; when no culprit for conservation challenges can be found, ask who benefits from acts of conservation. In the second and third stages, consideration must also be given to ability to pay 
650 4 |a Journal Article 
650 4 |a 保护公平性 
650 4 |a a pluralist account 
650 4 |a ability to pay 
650 4 |a beneficios 
650 4 |a benefits 
650 4 |a conservation justice 
650 4 |a contribución al problema 
650 4 |a contribution to the problem 
650 4 |a distributive justice 
650 4 |a habilidad para pagar 
650 4 |a justicia de conservación 
650 4 |a justicia distributiva 
650 4 |a una cuenta pluralista 
650 4 |a 分配公平性 
650 4 |a 利益 
650 4 |a 多元主义解释 
650 4 |a 对问题的贡献 
650 4 |a 支付能力 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology  |d 1999  |g 33(2019), 3 vom: 19. Juni, Seite 554-560  |w (DE-627)NLM098176803  |x 1523-1739  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:33  |g year:2019  |g number:3  |g day:19  |g month:06  |g pages:554-560 
856 4 0 |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cobi.13260  |3 Volltext 
912 |a GBV_USEFLAG_A 
912 |a SYSFLAG_A 
912 |a GBV_NLM 
912 |a GBV_ILN_350 
951 |a AR 
952 |d 33  |j 2019  |e 3  |b 19  |c 06  |h 554-560