Opportunities for better use of collective action theory in research and governance for invasive species management

© 2018 The Authors. Conservation Biology published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of Society for Conservation Biology.

Détails bibliographiques
Publié dans:Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology. - 1989. - 33(2019), 2 vom: 12. Apr., Seite 275-287
Auteur principal: Graham, Sonia (Auteur)
Autres auteurs: Metcalf, Alexander L, Gill, Nicholas, Niemiec, Rebecca, Moreno, Carlo, Bach, Thomas, Ikutegbe, Victoria, Hallstrom, Lars, Ma, Zhao, Lubeck, Alice
Format: Article en ligne
Langue:English
Publié: 2019
Accès à la collection:Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology
Sujets:Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S. Review alien species co-manejo comanagement cooperación cooperation coordinación plus... coordination dilema social especie invasora especie no nativa non-native species participación participation social dilemma 外来物种, 非本地物种, 共同管理, 合作, 协调, 社会困境, 参与
LEADER 01000caa a22002652 4500
001 NLM291782558
003 DE-627
005 20250224124339.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 231225s2019 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1111/cobi.13266  |2 doi 
028 5 2 |a pubmed25n0972.xml 
035 |a (DE-627)NLM291782558 
035 |a (NLM)30548338 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rakwb 
041 |a eng 
100 1 |a Graham, Sonia  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Opportunities for better use of collective action theory in research and governance for invasive species management 
264 1 |c 2019 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a ƒaComputermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a ƒa Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
500 |a Date Completed 18.11.2019 
500 |a Date Revised 19.10.2023 
500 |a published: Print-Electronic 
500 |a Citation Status MEDLINE 
520 |a © 2018 The Authors. Conservation Biology published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of Society for Conservation Biology. 
520 |a Controlling invasive species presents a public-good dilemma. Although environmental, social, and economic benefits of control accrue to society, costs are borne by only a few individuals and organizations. For decades, policy makers have used incentives and sanctions to encourage or coerce individual actors to contribute to the public good, with limited success. Diverse, subnational efforts to collectively manage invasive plants, insects, and animals provide effective alternatives to traditional command-and-control approaches. Despite this work, there has been little systematic evaluation of collective efforts to determine whether there are consistent principles underpinning success. We reviewed 32 studies to identify the extent to which collective-action theories from related agricultural and environmental fields explain collaborative invasive species management approaches; describe and differentiate emergent invasive species collective-action efforts; and provide guidance on how to enable more collaborative approaches to invasive species management. We identified 4 types of collective action aimed at invasive species-externally led, community led, comanaged, and organizational coalitions-that provide blueprints for future invasive species management. Existing collective-action theories could explain the importance attributed to developing shared knowledge of the social-ecological system and the need for social capital. Yet, collection action on invasive species requires different types of monitoring, sanctions, and boundary definitions. We argue that future government policies can benefit from establishing flexible boundaries that encourage social learning and enable colocated individuals and organizations to identify common goals, pool resources, and coordinate efforts 
650 4 |a Journal Article 
650 4 |a Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't 
650 4 |a Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S. 
650 4 |a Review 
650 4 |a alien species 
650 4 |a co-manejo 
650 4 |a comanagement 
650 4 |a cooperación 
650 4 |a cooperation 
650 4 |a coordinación 
650 4 |a coordination 
650 4 |a dilema social 
650 4 |a especie invasora 
650 4 |a especie no nativa 
650 4 |a non-native species 
650 4 |a participación 
650 4 |a participation 
650 4 |a social dilemma 
650 4 |a 外来物种, 非本地物种, 共同管理, 合作, 协调, 社会困境, 参与 
700 1 |a Metcalf, Alexander L  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Gill, Nicholas  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Niemiec, Rebecca  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Moreno, Carlo  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Bach, Thomas  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Ikutegbe, Victoria  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Hallstrom, Lars  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Ma, Zhao  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Lubeck, Alice  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology  |d 1989  |g 33(2019), 2 vom: 12. Apr., Seite 275-287  |w (DE-627)NLM098176803  |x 1523-1739  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:33  |g year:2019  |g number:2  |g day:12  |g month:04  |g pages:275-287 
856 4 0 |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cobi.13266  |3 Volltext 
912 |a GBV_USEFLAG_A 
912 |a SYSFLAG_A 
912 |a GBV_NLM 
912 |a GBV_ILN_350 
951 |a AR 
952 |d 33  |j 2019  |e 2  |b 12  |c 04  |h 275-287