LEADER 01000caa a22002652 4500
001 NLM289852447
003 DE-627
005 20250224065826.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 231225s2019 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1111/cobi.13241  |2 doi 
028 5 2 |a pubmed25n0966.xml 
035 |a (DE-627)NLM289852447 
035 |a (NLM)30350889 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rakwb 
041 |a eng 
100 1 |a Ceauşu, Silvia  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Governing trade-offs in ecosystem services and disservices to achieve human-wildlife coexistence 
264 1 |c 2019 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a ƒaComputermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a ƒa Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
500 |a Date Completed 11.12.2019 
500 |a Date Revised 17.12.2019 
500 |a published: Print-Electronic 
500 |a Citation Status MEDLINE 
520 |a © 2018 Society for Conservation Biology. 
520 |a Sustaining wildlife populations, which provide both ecosystem services and disservices, represents a worldwide conservation challenge. The ecosystem services and Ostrom's social-ecological systems frameworks have been adopted across natural and social sciences to characterize benefits from nature. Despite their generalizability, individually they do not include explicit tools for addressing the sustainable management of many wildlife populations. For instance, Ostrom's framework does not specifically address competing perspectives on wildlife, whereas the ecosystem services framework provides a limited representation of the social and governance context wherein such competing perspectives are embedded. We developed a unified social-ecological framework of ecosystem disservices and services (SEEDS) that advances both frameworks by explicitly acknowledging the importance of competing wildlife perspectives embedded in the social and governance contexts. The SEEDS framework emulates the hierarchical structure of Ostrom's social-ecological systems, but adds subsystems reflecting heterogeneous stakeholder views and experiences of wildlife-based services and disservices. To facilitate operationalizing SEEDS and further broader analyses across human-wildlife systems, we devised a list of variables to describe SEEDS subsystems, such as types and level of services and disservices, cost and benefit sharing, and social participation of stakeholders. Steps to implement SEEDS involve engaging local communities and stakeholders to define the subsystems, analyze interactions and outcomes, and identify leverage points and actions to remedy unwanted outcomes. These steps connect SEEDS with other existing approaches in social-ecological research and can guide analyses across systems or within individual systems to provide new insights and management options for sustainable human-wildlife coexistence 
650 4 |a Journal Article 
650 4 |a Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't 
650 4 |a Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S. 
650 4 |a conflicto humano - fauna 
650 4 |a conservación de fauna 
650 4 |a human-wildlife conflict 
650 4 |a manejo de fauna 
650 4 |a manejo de recursos 
650 4 |a resource management 
650 4 |a sistemas socio-ecológicos 
650 4 |a social-ecological systems 
650 4 |a wildlife conservation 
650 4 |a wildlife management 
650 4 |a 人类-野生生物冲突, 资源管理, 社会-生态系统, 野生生物保护, 野生生物管理 
700 1 |a Graves, Rose A  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Killion, Alexander K  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Svenning, Jens-Christian  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Carter, Neil H  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology  |d 1989  |g 33(2019), 3 vom: 01. Juni, Seite 543-553  |w (DE-627)NLM098176803  |x 1523-1739  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:33  |g year:2019  |g number:3  |g day:01  |g month:06  |g pages:543-553 
856 4 0 |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cobi.13241  |3 Volltext 
912 |a GBV_USEFLAG_A 
912 |a SYSFLAG_A 
912 |a GBV_NLM 
912 |a GBV_ILN_350 
951 |a AR 
952 |d 33  |j 2019  |e 3  |b 01  |c 06  |h 543-553