Sex-biased gene expression in flowers, but not leaves, reveals secondary sexual dimorphism in Populus balsamifera

© 2018 The Authors. New Phytologist © 2018 New Phytologist Trust.

Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The New phytologist. - 1979. - 221(2019), 1 vom: 01. Jan., Seite 527-539
1. Verfasser: Sanderson, Brian J (VerfasserIn)
Weitere Verfasser: Wang, Li, Tiffin, Peter, Wu, Zhiqiang, Olson, Matthew S
Format: Online-Aufsatz
Sprache:English
Veröffentlicht: 2019
Zugriff auf das übergeordnete Werk:The New phytologist
Schlagworte:Journal Article Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S. RNA-seq dioecy protein evolution sex determination sex-biased expression Plant Proteins
LEADER 01000naa a22002652 4500
001 NLM288883721
003 DE-627
005 20231225061325.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 231225s2019 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1111/nph.15421  |2 doi 
028 5 2 |a pubmed24n0962.xml 
035 |a (DE-627)NLM288883721 
035 |a (NLM)30252135 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rakwb 
041 |a eng 
100 1 |a Sanderson, Brian J  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Sex-biased gene expression in flowers, but not leaves, reveals secondary sexual dimorphism in Populus balsamifera 
264 1 |c 2019 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a ƒaComputermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a ƒa Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
500 |a Date Completed 21.01.2020 
500 |a Date Revised 30.09.2020 
500 |a published: Print-Electronic 
500 |a CommentIn: New Phytol. 2019 Jan;221(1):10-11. - PMID 30488603 
500 |a Citation Status MEDLINE 
520 |a © 2018 The Authors. New Phytologist © 2018 New Phytologist Trust. 
520 |a Because sexual dimorphism in plants is often less morphologically conspicuous than in animals, studies of sex-biased gene expression may provide a quantitative metric to better address their commonality, molecular pathways, consistency across tissues and taxa, and evolution. The presence of sex-biased gene expression in tissues other than the androecium or gynoecium, termed secondary sexual characters, suggests that these traits arose after the initial evolution of dioecy. Patterns of sequence evolution may provide evidence of positive selection that drove sexual specialization. We compared gene expression in male and female flowers and leaves of Populus balsamifera to assess the extent of sex-biased expression, and tested whether sex-biased genes exhibit elevated rates of protein evolution. Sex-biased expression was pervasive in floral tissue, but nearly absent in leaf tissue. Female-biased genes in flowers were associated with photosynthesis, whereas male-biased genes were associated with mitochondrial function. Sex-biased genes did not exhibit elevated rates of protein evolution, contrary to results from other studies in animals and plants. Our results suggest that the ecological and physiological constraints associated with the energetics of flowering, rather than sexual conflict, have probably shaped the differences in male and female gene expression in P. balsamifera 
650 4 |a Journal Article 
650 4 |a Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S. 
650 4 |a RNA-seq 
650 4 |a dioecy 
650 4 |a protein evolution 
650 4 |a sex determination 
650 4 |a sex-biased expression 
650 7 |a Plant Proteins  |2 NLM 
700 1 |a Wang, Li  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Tiffin, Peter  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Wu, Zhiqiang  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Olson, Matthew S  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t The New phytologist  |d 1979  |g 221(2019), 1 vom: 01. Jan., Seite 527-539  |w (DE-627)NLM09818248X  |x 1469-8137  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:221  |g year:2019  |g number:1  |g day:01  |g month:01  |g pages:527-539 
856 4 0 |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/nph.15421  |3 Volltext 
912 |a GBV_USEFLAG_A 
912 |a SYSFLAG_A 
912 |a GBV_NLM 
912 |a GBV_ILN_350 
951 |a AR 
952 |d 221  |j 2019  |e 1  |b 01  |c 01  |h 527-539