Evaluation of two statistical approaches for estimating pollutant loads at adjacent combined sewer overflow structures

Quantifying pollutant loads from combined sewer overflows (CSOs) is necessary for assessing impacts of urban drainage on receiving water bodies. Based on data obtained at three adjacent CSO structures in the Louis Fargue catchment in Bordeaux, France, this study implements multiple linear regression...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research. - 1986. - 78(2018), 3-4 vom: 22. Sept., Seite 699-707
1. Verfasser: Ly, Duy Khiem (VerfasserIn)
Weitere Verfasser: Maruéjouls, Thibaud, Binet, Guillaume, Litrico, Xavier, Bertrand-Krajewski, Jean-Luc
Format: Online-Aufsatz
Sprache:English
Veröffentlicht: 2018
Zugriff auf das übergeordnete Werk:Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research
Schlagworte:Journal Article Environmental Pollutants Sewage
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Quantifying pollutant loads from combined sewer overflows (CSOs) is necessary for assessing impacts of urban drainage on receiving water bodies. Based on data obtained at three adjacent CSO structures in the Louis Fargue catchment in Bordeaux, France, this study implements multiple linear regression (MLR) and random forest regression (RFR) approaches to develop statistical models for estimating emitted loads of total suspended solids (TSS). Comparison between hierarchical clustering selection and random selection of CSO events for model calibration is included in model development. The results indicate that selection of the model's explanatory variables depends on both the type of approach and the CSO structure. By using the cluster technique to select representative events for model calibration, model predictability is generally improved. For the available dataset, MLR may have advantages over RFR in terms of verification performance and lower range of error due to splitting events for calibration and verification. But RFR model uncertainty bands are considerably narrower than the MLR ones
Beschreibung:Date Completed 28.01.2019
Date Revised 15.12.2020
published: Print
Citation Status MEDLINE
ISSN:0273-1223
DOI:10.2166/wst.2018.346