LEADER 01000naa a22002652 4500
001 NLM287905632
003 DE-627
005 20231225055106.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 231225s2019 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1111/cobi.13215  |2 doi 
028 5 2 |a pubmed24n0959.xml 
035 |a (DE-627)NLM287905632 
035 |a (NLM)30152551 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rakwb 
041 |a eng 
100 1 |a Gooden, Jennifer  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
245 1 4 |a The psychological appeal of owning private land for conservation 
264 1 |c 2019 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a ƒaComputermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a ƒa Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
500 |a Date Completed 18.11.2019 
500 |a Date Revised 18.11.2019 
500 |a published: Print-Electronic 
500 |a Citation Status MEDLINE 
520 |a © 2018 Society for Conservation Biology. 
520 |a Continued threats to global biodiversity have stimulated interest in the private purchase of land for conservation. Though not a new phenomenon, private land conservation appears to be on the rise, and its ambiguous position between philanthropy and financial investment leads to questions about the nature of landowner motives. To examine these motives, we used grounded theory techniques to analyze transcripts of narrative interviews with the owners of privately conserved areas (PCAs) and assessed what landowners had in common across a variety of cultural and policy contexts. The result was a model of PCA engagement in which landowners became personally invested in the management of PCAs and in the nature they protected. We found that PCAs can be conceptualized not merely as philanthropic endeavors or investments, but also as meaningful projects in which their owners engage. We integrated our findings with literature indicating that fundamental psychological drives for autonomy, efficacy, and social connection facilitate the engagement process, regardless of whether conservation motivation is intrinsic or extrinsic. Our findings suggest that land conservation programs might benefit from allowing landowner autonomy to the maximum extent possible, developing best practice standards against which landowners can assess their efficacy, and facilitating the development of landowner networks 
650 4 |a Journal Article 
650 4 |a Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't 
650 4 |a autonomy 
650 4 |a autonomía 
650 4 |a bienestar 
650 4 |a conservation psychology 
650 4 |a eudaimonia 
650 4 |a extrinsic motivation 
650 4 |a filantropía 
650 4 |a grounded theory 
650 4 |a intrinsic motivation 
650 4 |a motivación extrínseca 
650 4 |a motivación intrínseca 
650 4 |a personal projects 
650 4 |a philanthropy 
650 4 |a proyectos personales 
650 4 |a psicología de la conservación 
650 4 |a teoría fundamentada 
650 4 |a well-being 
650 4 |a 个人解决方案 
650 4 |a 保护心理学 
650 4 |a 公益行为 
650 4 |a 内在动机 
650 4 |a 外在动机 
650 4 |a 幸福 
650 4 |a 扎根理论 
650 4 |a 福祉 
650 4 |a 自主权 
700 1 |a Grenyer, Richard  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology  |d 1999  |g 33(2019), 2 vom: 01. Apr., Seite 339-350  |w (DE-627)NLM098176803  |x 1523-1739  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:33  |g year:2019  |g number:2  |g day:01  |g month:04  |g pages:339-350 
856 4 0 |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cobi.13215  |3 Volltext 
912 |a GBV_USEFLAG_A 
912 |a SYSFLAG_A 
912 |a GBV_NLM 
912 |a GBV_ILN_350 
951 |a AR 
952 |d 33  |j 2019  |e 2  |b 01  |c 04  |h 339-350