LEADER 01000naa a22002652 4500
001 NLM281893667
003 DE-627
005 20231225032658.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 231225s2018 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1111/cobi.13110  |2 doi 
028 5 2 |a pubmed24n0939.xml 
035 |a (DE-627)NLM281893667 
035 |a (NLM)29532979 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rakwb 
041 |a eng 
100 1 |a Evans, Kristen  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Participatory monitoring to connect local and global priorities for forest restoration 
264 1 |c 2018 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a ƒaComputermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a ƒa Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
500 |a Date Completed 17.10.2019 
500 |a Date Revised 17.10.2019 
500 |a published: Print-Electronic 
500 |a Citation Status MEDLINE 
520 |a © 2018 The Authors. Conservation Biology published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of Society for Conservation Biology. 
520 |a New global initiatives to restore forest landscapes present an unparalleled opportunity to reverse deforestation and forest degradation. Participatory monitoring could play a crucial role in providing accountability, generating local buy in, and catalyzing learning in monitoring systems that need scalability and adaptability to a range of local sites. We synthesized current knowledge from literature searches and interviews to provide lessons for the development of a scalable, multisite participatory monitoring system. Studies show that local people can collect accurate data on forest change, drivers of change, threats to reforestation, and biophysical and socioeconomic impacts that remote sensing cannot. They can do this at one-third the cost of professionals. Successful participatory monitoring systems collect information on a few simple indicators, respond to local priorities, provide appropriate incentives for participation, and catalyze learning and decision making based on frequent analyses and multilevel interactions with other stakeholders. Participatory monitoring could provide a framework for linking global, national, and local needs, aspirations, and capacities for forest restoration 
650 4 |a Journal Article 
650 4 |a Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't 
650 4 |a Review 
650 4 |a adaptive management 
650 4 |a cambio en el bosque 
650 4 |a evaluación de la restauración 
650 4 |a forest change 
650 4 |a large-scale restoration 
650 4 |a local monitoring 
650 4 |a manejo adaptativo 
650 4 |a monitoreo local 
650 4 |a monitoring protocols 
650 4 |a protocolos de monitoreo 
650 4 |a reforestación 
650 4 |a reforestation 
650 4 |a rendición de cuentas de la restauración 
650 4 |a restauración a gran escala 
650 4 |a restoration accountability 
650 4 |a restoration assessment 
650 4 |a restoration success 
650 4 |a éxito de restauración 
650 4 |a 再造林 
650 4 |a 大尺度恢复 
650 4 |a 恢复成功 
650 4 |a 恢复评估 
650 4 |a 恢复责任制 
650 4 |a 本地监控 
650 4 |a 森林变化 
650 4 |a 监控协议 
650 4 |a 适应性管理 
700 1 |a Guariguata, Manuel R  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Brancalion, Pedro H S  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology  |d 1999  |g 32(2018), 3 vom: 17. Juni, Seite 525-534  |w (DE-627)NLM098176803  |x 1523-1739  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:32  |g year:2018  |g number:3  |g day:17  |g month:06  |g pages:525-534 
856 4 0 |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cobi.13110  |3 Volltext 
912 |a GBV_USEFLAG_A 
912 |a SYSFLAG_A 
912 |a GBV_NLM 
912 |a GBV_ILN_350 
951 |a AR 
952 |d 32  |j 2018  |e 3  |b 17  |c 06  |h 525-534