LEADER 01000naa a22002652 4500
001 NLM280116411
003 DE-627
005 20231225024608.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 231225s2018 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1111/cobi.13076  |2 doi 
028 5 2 |a pubmed24n0933.xml 
035 |a (DE-627)NLM280116411 
035 |a (NLM)29349820 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rakwb 
041 |a eng 
100 1 |a Kronenberger, John A  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
245 1 3 |a An experimental test of alternative population augmentation scenarios 
264 1 |c 2018 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a ƒaComputermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a ƒa Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
500 |a Date Completed 17.10.2019 
500 |a Date Revised 17.10.2019 
500 |a published: Print-Electronic 
500 |a Citation Status MEDLINE 
520 |a © 2018 Society for Conservation Biology. 
520 |a Human land use is fragmenting habitats worldwide and inhibiting dispersal among previously connected populations of organisms, often leading to inbreeding depression and reduced evolutionary potential in the face of rapid environmental change. To combat this augmentation of isolated populations with immigrants is sometimes used to facilitate demographic and genetic rescue. Augmentation with immigrants that are genetically and adaptively similar to the target population effectively increases population fitness, but if immigrants are very genetically or adaptively divergent, augmentation can lead to outbreeding depression. Despite well-cited guidelines for the best practice selection of immigrant sources, often only highly divergent populations remain, and experimental tests of these riskier augmentation scenarios are essentially nonexistent. We conducted a mesocosm experiment with Trinidadian guppies (Poecilia reticulata) to test the multigenerational demographic and genetic effects of augmenting 2 target populations with 3 types of divergent immigrants. We found no evidence of demographic rescue, but we did observe genetic rescue in one population. Divergent immigrant treatments tended to maintain greater genetic diversity, abundance, and hybrid fitness than controls that received immigrants from the source used to seed the mesocosms. In the second population, divergent immigrants had a slightly negative effect in one treatment, and the benefits of augmentation were less apparent overall, likely because this population started with higher genetic diversity and a lower reproductive rate that limited genetic admixture. Our results add to a growing consensus that gene flow can increase population fitness even when immigrants are more highly divergent and may help reduce uncertainty about the use of augmentation in conservation 
650 4 |a Journal Article 
650 4 |a Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't 
650 4 |a Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S. 
650 4 |a Poecilia Reticulata 
650 4 |a Poecilia reticulata 
650 4 |a adaptive divergence 
650 4 |a assisted migration 
650 4 |a demographic rescue 
650 4 |a divergencia adaptativa 
650 4 |a divergencia genética 
650 4 |a genetic divergence 
650 4 |a genetic rescue 
650 4 |a migración asistida 
650 4 |a rescate demográfico 
650 4 |a rescate genético 
650 4 |a reubicación 
650 4 |a suplemento 
650 4 |a supplementation 
650 4 |a translocation 
650 4 |a 适应趋异, 协助迁移, 种群数量拯救, 遗传趋异, 遗传拯救, 孔雀鱼 (Poecilia reticulate), 扩充, 迁地 
700 1 |a Gerberich, Jill C  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Fitzpatrick, Sarah W  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Broder, E Dale  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Angeloni, Lisa M  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Funk, W Chris  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology  |d 1999  |g 32(2018), 4 vom: 19. Aug., Seite 838-848  |w (DE-627)NLM098176803  |x 1523-1739  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:32  |g year:2018  |g number:4  |g day:19  |g month:08  |g pages:838-848 
856 4 0 |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cobi.13076  |3 Volltext 
912 |a GBV_USEFLAG_A 
912 |a SYSFLAG_A 
912 |a GBV_NLM 
912 |a GBV_ILN_350 
951 |a AR 
952 |d 32  |j 2018  |e 4  |b 19  |c 08  |h 838-848