|
|
|
|
| LEADER |
01000caa a22002652c 4500 |
| 001 |
NLM275641635 |
| 003 |
DE-627 |
| 005 |
20250222065436.0 |
| 007 |
cr uuu---uuuuu |
| 008 |
231225s2017 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c |
| 024 |
7 |
|
|a 10.1177/0734242X17728123
|2 doi
|
| 028 |
5 |
2 |
|a pubmed25n0918.xml
|
| 035 |
|
|
|a (DE-627)NLM275641635
|
| 035 |
|
|
|a (NLM)28893135
|
| 040 |
|
|
|a DE-627
|b ger
|c DE-627
|e rakwb
|
| 041 |
|
|
|a eng
|
| 100 |
1 |
|
|a Medina Jimenez, Ana Carolina
|e verfasserin
|4 aut
|
| 245 |
1 |
0 |
|a Evaluation of two different alternatives of energy recovery from municipal solid waste in Brazil
|
| 264 |
|
1 |
|c 2017
|
| 336 |
|
|
|a Text
|b txt
|2 rdacontent
|
| 337 |
|
|
|a ƒaComputermedien
|b c
|2 rdamedia
|
| 338 |
|
|
|a ƒa Online-Ressource
|b cr
|2 rdacarrier
|
| 500 |
|
|
|a Date Completed 17.01.2018
|
| 500 |
|
|
|a Date Revised 17.01.2018
|
| 500 |
|
|
|a published: Print-Electronic
|
| 500 |
|
|
|a Citation Status MEDLINE
|
| 520 |
|
|
|a Brazil has a large population with a high waste generation. The municipal solid waste (MSW) generated is deposited mainly in landfills. However, a considerable fraction of the waste is still improperly disposed of in dumpsters. In order to overcome this inadequate deposition, it is necessary to seek alternative routes. Between these alternatives, it is possible to quote gasification and incineration. The objective of this study is to compare, from an energetic and economic point of view, these technologies, aiming at their possible implementation in Brazilian cities. A total of two configurations were evaluated: (i) waste incineration with energy recovery and electricity production in a steam cycle; and (ii) waste gasification, where the syngas produced is used as fuel in a boiler of a steam cycle for electricity production. Simulations were performed assuming the same amount of available waste for both configurations, with a composition corresponding to the MSW from Santo André, Brazil. The thermal efficiencies of the gasification and incineration configurations were 19.3% and 25.1%, respectively. The difference in the efficiencies was caused by the irreversibilities associated with the gasification process, and the additional electricity consumption in the waste treatment step. The economic analysis presented a cost of electrical energy produced of 0.113 (US$ kWh-1) and 0.139 (US$ kWh-1) for the incineration and gasification plants respectively
|
| 650 |
|
4 |
|a Journal Article
|
| 650 |
|
4 |
|a Waste-to-energy
|
| 650 |
|
4 |
|a energy recovery
|
| 650 |
|
4 |
|a gasification
|
| 650 |
|
4 |
|a municipal solid waste
|
| 650 |
|
7 |
|a Solid Waste
|2 NLM
|
| 700 |
1 |
|
|a Nordi, Guilherme Henrique
|e verfasserin
|4 aut
|
| 700 |
1 |
|
|a Palacios Bereche, Milagros Cecilia
|e verfasserin
|4 aut
|
| 700 |
1 |
|
|a Bereche, Reynaldo Palacios
|e verfasserin
|4 aut
|
| 700 |
1 |
|
|a Gallego, Antonio Garrido
|e verfasserin
|4 aut
|
| 700 |
1 |
|
|a Nebra, Silvia Azucena
|e verfasserin
|4 aut
|
| 773 |
0 |
8 |
|i Enthalten in
|t Waste management & research : the journal of the International Solid Wastes and Public Cleansing Association, ISWA
|d 1991
|g 35(2017), 11 vom: 26. Nov., Seite 1137-1148
|w (DE-627)NLM098164791
|x 1096-3669
|7 nnas
|
| 773 |
1 |
8 |
|g volume:35
|g year:2017
|g number:11
|g day:26
|g month:11
|g pages:1137-1148
|
| 856 |
4 |
0 |
|u http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0734242X17728123
|3 Volltext
|
| 912 |
|
|
|a GBV_USEFLAG_A
|
| 912 |
|
|
|a SYSFLAG_A
|
| 912 |
|
|
|a GBV_NLM
|
| 912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_350
|
| 951 |
|
|
|a AR
|
| 952 |
|
|
|d 35
|j 2017
|e 11
|b 26
|c 11
|h 1137-1148
|