Effects of exposure to nano and bulk sized TiO2 and CuO in Lemna minor

Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.

Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Plant physiology and biochemistry : PPB. - 1991. - 119(2017) vom: 02. Okt., Seite 43-49
1. Verfasser: Dolenc Koce, Jasna (VerfasserIn)
Format: Online-Aufsatz
Sprache:English
Veröffentlicht: 2017
Zugriff auf das übergeordnete Werk:Plant physiology and biochemistry : PPB
Schlagworte:Journal Article Antioxidative enzymes CuO Growth inhibition test Lemna minor Nanoparticles TiO(2) Antioxidants Plant Proteins titanium dioxide mehr... 15FIX9V2JP Copper 789U1901C5 Titanium D1JT611TNE Oxidoreductases EC 1.- cupric oxide V1XJQ704R4
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.
Nanoparticles of TiO2 and CuO are among most commonly used nanoparticles, and elevated concentrations of them are expected to be found in all environments, including aquatic. A standard growth inhibition test ISO/CD 20079 was used to determine the toxicity of nano sized and larger micro sized (bulk) particles in the concentrations of 0.1, 1, 10, 100 and 1000 μM CuO and TiO2 on common duckweed (Lemna minor L.). Both nano and bulk CuO particles caused changes in the structure and function of treated plants. The number of fronds and colonies decreased by as much as 78%, the length of roots and fronds decreased by 99% and 14%, respectively. Furthermore, photochemical efficiency was reduced by up to 35%, and the activities of antioxidative enzymes guaiacol peroxidase, ascorbate peroxidase and glutathione reductase increased by more than 240%. The altered physiological state of the CuO exposed plants was also reflected in the elevated occurrence of necrosis and bleaching in the duckweed colonies. Nano sized particles of CuO proved more phytotoxic than bulk particles, and the effects of both studied CuO sizes were concentration dependent. On the other hand, both bulk and nano sized particles of TiO2 caused no severe phytotoxic effects, there was no concentration dependence and they could be considered as non-harmful to common duckweed
Beschreibung:Date Completed 26.12.2017
Date Revised 30.09.2020
published: Print-Electronic
Citation Status MEDLINE
ISSN:1873-2690
DOI:10.1016/j.plaphy.2017.08.014