Comparison of commercial baker's yeast versus bacteria-based membrane bioreactors for landfill leachate treatment

This study compares the performance of the membrane bioreactor (MBR) inoculated with commercial baker's yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) (MBRy) versus one inoculated with bacterial sludge (MBRb) for treatment of landfill leachate. The MBRb and MBRy were operated with a hydraulic retention time...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Environmental technology. - 1993. - 39(2018), 18 vom: 20. Sept., Seite 2365-2372
1. Verfasser: Amaral, M C S (VerfasserIn)
Weitere Verfasser: Brito, G C B, Reis, B G, Lange, L C, Moravia, W G
Format: Online-Aufsatz
Sprache:English
Veröffentlicht: 2018
Zugriff auf das übergeordnete Werk:Environmental technology
Schlagworte:Journal Article Membrane bioreactor baker’s yeast fouling landfill leachate microfiltration Membranes, Artificial Water Pollutants, Chemical Nitrogen N762921K75
LEADER 01000naa a22002652 4500
001 NLM273880225
003 DE-627
005 20231225002227.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 231225s2018 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1080/09593330.2017.1355931  |2 doi 
028 5 2 |a pubmed24n0912.xml 
035 |a (DE-627)NLM273880225 
035 |a (NLM)28712332 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rakwb 
041 |a eng 
100 1 |a Amaral, M C S  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Comparison of commercial baker's yeast versus bacteria-based membrane bioreactors for landfill leachate treatment 
264 1 |c 2018 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a ƒaComputermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a ƒa Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
500 |a Date Completed 15.08.2018 
500 |a Date Revised 02.12.2018 
500 |a published: Print-Electronic 
500 |a Citation Status MEDLINE 
520 |a This study compares the performance of the membrane bioreactor (MBR) inoculated with commercial baker's yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) (MBRy) versus one inoculated with bacterial sludge (MBRb) for treatment of landfill leachate. The MBRb and MBRy were operated with a hydraulic retention time of 48 h, solids retention time of 60 d, and specific air demand based on membrane area of 0.6 m3 h-1 m-2. The MBRy was more efficient in removing chemical oxygen demand (COD) (68 ± 12%), color (79 ± 8%), ammoniacal nitrogen (58 ± 18%), and phosphorus (62 ± 19%) compared to MBRb, which showed removal efficiencies of 44 ± 18%, 46 ± 20%, 45 ± 17%, and 29 ± 15% for COD, color, ammoniacal nitrogen, and phosphorus. Furthermore, the MBRy had lower production of soluble microbial products, which are the main cause of membrane fouling, and so a lower membrane fouling potential. The average hydraulic permeability of the MBRy (32.23 L m-2 h-1 bar-1) was about four times higher than that of the MBRb (8.34 L m-2 h-1 bar-1). Thus using commercial baker's yeasts as a MBR inoculum can enhance pollutants' removal and membrane performance 
650 4 |a Journal Article 
650 4 |a Membrane bioreactor 
650 4 |a baker’s yeast 
650 4 |a fouling 
650 4 |a landfill leachate 
650 4 |a microfiltration 
650 7 |a Membranes, Artificial  |2 NLM 
650 7 |a Water Pollutants, Chemical  |2 NLM 
650 7 |a Nitrogen  |2 NLM 
650 7 |a N762921K75  |2 NLM 
700 1 |a Brito, G C B  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Reis, B G  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Lange, L C  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Moravia, W G  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Environmental technology  |d 1993  |g 39(2018), 18 vom: 20. Sept., Seite 2365-2372  |w (DE-627)NLM098202545  |x 1479-487X  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:39  |g year:2018  |g number:18  |g day:20  |g month:09  |g pages:2365-2372 
856 4 0 |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09593330.2017.1355931  |3 Volltext 
912 |a GBV_USEFLAG_A 
912 |a SYSFLAG_A 
912 |a GBV_NLM 
912 |a GBV_ILN_350 
951 |a AR 
952 |d 39  |j 2018  |e 18  |b 20  |c 09  |h 2365-2372