|
|
|
|
| LEADER |
01000caa a22002652 4500 |
| 001 |
NLM273821393 |
| 003 |
DE-627 |
| 005 |
20240326233836.0 |
| 007 |
tu |
| 008 |
231225s2017 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c |
| 028 |
5 |
2 |
|a pubmed24n1348.xml
|
| 035 |
|
|
|a (DE-627)NLM273821393
|
| 035 |
|
|
|a (NLM)28706312
|
| 040 |
|
|
|a DE-627
|b ger
|c DE-627
|e rakwb
|
| 041 |
|
|
|a eng
|
| 100 |
1 |
|
|a Baidoo, Richard
|e verfasserin
|4 aut
|
| 245 |
1 |
0 |
|a Management of Root-knot Nematode (Meloidogyne incognita) on Pittosporum tobira Under Greenhouse, Field, and On-farm Conditions in Florida
|
| 264 |
|
1 |
|c 2017
|
| 336 |
|
|
|a Text
|b txt
|2 rdacontent
|
| 337 |
|
|
|a ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen
|b n
|2 rdamedia
|
| 338 |
|
|
|a Band
|b nc
|2 rdacarrier
|
| 500 |
|
|
|a Date Revised 26.03.2024
|
| 500 |
|
|
|a published: Print
|
| 500 |
|
|
|a Citation Status PubMed-not-MEDLINE
|
| 520 |
|
|
|a Root-knot nematodes are important pests of cut foliage crops in Florida. Currently, effective nematicides for control of these nematodes on cut foliage crops are lacking. Hence, research was conducted at the University of Florida to identify pesticides or biopesticides that could be used to manage these nematodes. The research comprised on-farm, field, and greenhouse trials. Nematicide treatments evaluated include commercial formulations of spirotetramat, furfural, and Purpureocillium lilacinum (=Paecilomyces lilacinus) strain 251. Treatment applications were made during the spring and fall seasons according to manufacturer's specifications. Efficacy was evaluated based on J2/100 cm3 of soil, J2/g of root, and crop yield (kg/plot). Unlike spirotetramat, which did not demonstrate any measurable effects on Meloidogyne incognita J2 in the soil, furfural and P. lilacinum were marginally effective in reducing the population density of M. incognita on Pittosporum tobira. However, nematode reduction did not affect yield significantly. Although furfural and P. lilacinum have some potential for management of M. incognita on cut foliage crops, their use as a lone management option would likely not provide the needed level of control. Early treatment application following infestation provided greater J2 suppression compared to late application, suggesting the need for growers to avoid infested fields
|
| 650 |
|
4 |
|a Journal Article
|
| 650 |
|
4 |
|a Meloidogyne incognita
|
| 650 |
|
4 |
|a Paecilomyces lilacinus
|
| 650 |
|
4 |
|a Pittosporum tobira
|
| 650 |
|
4 |
|a Purpureocillium lilacinum
|
| 650 |
|
4 |
|a furfural
|
| 650 |
|
4 |
|a management
|
| 650 |
|
4 |
|a pesticide
|
| 650 |
|
4 |
|a root-knot nematode
|
| 650 |
|
4 |
|a spirotetramat
|
| 700 |
1 |
|
|a Mengistu, Tesfamariam
|e verfasserin
|4 aut
|
| 700 |
1 |
|
|a McSorley, Robert
|e verfasserin
|4 aut
|
| 700 |
1 |
|
|a Stamps, Robert H
|e verfasserin
|4 aut
|
| 700 |
1 |
|
|a Brito, Janete
|e verfasserin
|4 aut
|
| 700 |
1 |
|
|a Crow, William T
|e verfasserin
|4 aut
|
| 773 |
0 |
8 |
|i Enthalten in
|t Journal of nematology
|d 1969
|g 49(2017), 2 vom: 13. Juni, Seite 133-139
|w (DE-627)NLM098196421
|x 0022-300X
|7 nnns
|
| 773 |
1 |
8 |
|g volume:49
|g year:2017
|g number:2
|g day:13
|g month:06
|g pages:133-139
|
| 912 |
|
|
|a GBV_USEFLAG_A
|
| 912 |
|
|
|a SYSFLAG_A
|
| 912 |
|
|
|a GBV_NLM
|
| 912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_350
|
| 951 |
|
|
|a AR
|
| 952 |
|
|
|d 49
|j 2017
|e 2
|b 13
|c 06
|h 133-139
|