The bias of a two-dimensional view : comparing two-dimensional and three-dimensional mesophyll surface area estimates using noninvasive imaging

© 2017 The Authors. New Phytologist © 2017 New Phytologist Trust.

Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The New phytologist. - 1990. - 215(2017), 4 vom: 10. Sept., Seite 1609-1622
1. Verfasser: Théroux-Rancourt, Guillaume (VerfasserIn)
Weitere Verfasser: Earles, J Mason, Gilbert, Matthew E, Zwieniecki, Maciej A, Boyce, C Kevin, McElrone, Andrew J, Brodersen, Craig R
Format: Online-Aufsatz
Sprache:English
Veröffentlicht: 2017
Zugriff auf das übergeordnete Werk:The New phytologist
Schlagworte:Comparative Study Journal Article CAM plants biodiversity high resolution X-ray microcomputed tomography (microCT) leaf anatomy leaf functional traits mesophyll
LEADER 01000caa a22002652 4500
001 NLM273676180
003 DE-627
005 20250221225428.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 231225s2017 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1111/nph.14687  |2 doi 
028 5 2 |a pubmed25n0912.xml 
035 |a (DE-627)NLM273676180 
035 |a (NLM)28691233 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rakwb 
041 |a eng 
100 1 |a Théroux-Rancourt, Guillaume  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
245 1 4 |a The bias of a two-dimensional view  |b comparing two-dimensional and three-dimensional mesophyll surface area estimates using noninvasive imaging 
264 1 |c 2017 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a ƒaComputermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a ƒa Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
500 |a Date Completed 15.05.2018 
500 |a Date Revised 30.03.2022 
500 |a published: Print-Electronic 
500 |a Citation Status MEDLINE 
520 |a © 2017 The Authors. New Phytologist © 2017 New Phytologist Trust. 
520 |a The mesophyll surface area exposed to intercellular air space per leaf area (Sm ) is closely associated with CO2 diffusion and photosynthetic rates. Sm is typically estimated from two-dimensional (2D) leaf sections and corrected for the three-dimensional (3D) geometry of mesophyll cells, leading to potential differences between the estimated and actual cell surface area. Here, we examined how 2D methods used for estimating Sm compare with 3D values obtained from high-resolution X-ray microcomputed tomography (microCT) for 23 plant species, with broad phylogenetic and anatomical coverage. Relative to 3D, uncorrected 2D Sm estimates were, on average, 15-30% lower. Two of the four 2D Sm methods typically fell within 10% of 3D values. For most species, only a few 2D slices were needed to accurately estimate Sm within 10% of the whole leaf sample median. However, leaves with reticulate vein networks required more sections because of a more heterogeneous vein coverage across slices. These results provide the first comparison of the accuracy of 2D methods in estimating the complex 3D geometry of internal leaf surfaces. Because microCT is not readily available, we provide guidance for using standard light microscopy techniques, as well as recommending standardization of reporting Sm values 
650 4 |a Comparative Study 
650 4 |a Journal Article 
650 4 |a CAM plants 
650 4 |a biodiversity 
650 4 |a high resolution X-ray microcomputed tomography (microCT) 
650 4 |a leaf anatomy 
650 4 |a leaf functional traits 
650 4 |a mesophyll 
700 1 |a Earles, J Mason  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Gilbert, Matthew E  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Zwieniecki, Maciej A  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Boyce, C Kevin  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a McElrone, Andrew J  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Brodersen, Craig R  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t The New phytologist  |d 1990  |g 215(2017), 4 vom: 10. Sept., Seite 1609-1622  |w (DE-627)NLM09818248X  |x 1469-8137  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:215  |g year:2017  |g number:4  |g day:10  |g month:09  |g pages:1609-1622 
856 4 0 |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/nph.14687  |3 Volltext 
912 |a GBV_USEFLAG_A 
912 |a SYSFLAG_A 
912 |a GBV_NLM 
912 |a GBV_ILN_350 
951 |a AR 
952 |d 215  |j 2017  |e 4  |b 10  |c 09  |h 1609-1622