Factor Structure of the Conflict Tactics Scale 1

BACKGROUND: The Conflict Tactics Scale 1 (CTS1) is a widely used self-report measure of abusive attitudes of parents towards children. The factor structure of the CTS1 still remains to be clarified. The aim of this study was to examine the factor structure of the Japanese version of the CTS1 for pos...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International journal of community based nursing and midwifery. - 2014. - 5(2017), 3 vom: 22. Juli, Seite 239-247
1. Verfasser: Baba, Kaori PhD (VerfasserIn)
Weitere Verfasser: Takauma, Fumie Rn, Tada, Katsuhiko PhD, Tanaka, Tomoko Rn, Sakanashi, Kyoko Ms, Kataoka, Yaeko PhD, Kitamura, Toshinori PhD
Format: Aufsatz
Sprache:English
Veröffentlicht: 2017
Zugriff auf das übergeordnete Werk:International journal of community based nursing and midwifery
Schlagworte:Journal Article Child abuse Factor analysis Perinatal care Psychometric testing Infant
LEADER 01000caa a22002652 4500
001 NLM273477730
003 DE-627
005 20250221220336.0
007 tu
008 231225s2017 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c
028 5 2 |a pubmed25n0911.xml 
035 |a (DE-627)NLM273477730 
035 |a (NLM)28670586 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rakwb 
041 |a eng 
100 1 |a Baba, Kaori  |c PhD  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Factor Structure of the Conflict Tactics Scale 1 
264 1 |c 2017 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen  |b n  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Band  |b nc  |2 rdacarrier 
500 |a Date Revised 30.09.2020 
500 |a published: Print 
500 |a Citation Status PubMed-not-MEDLINE 
520 |a BACKGROUND: The Conflict Tactics Scale 1 (CTS1) is a widely used self-report measure of abusive attitudes of parents towards children. The factor structure of the CTS1 still remains to be clarified. The aim of this study was to examine the factor structure of the Japanese version of the CTS1 for postpartum women in community settings 
520 |a METHOD: The data in this study came from the Okayama and Kumamoto's study. These were part of a larger survey using longitudinal questionnaire studies conducted in Japan from 2001 to 2002 and in 2011, respectively. In both study sites, the participant mothers were asked to fill in the CTS1 one month after delivery when they attended for check-up at the out-patient clinic 
520 |a RESULTS: A total of 1,150 questionnaires were collected, excluding the participants with missing values in the CTS1. Finally, 1,078 were included in the statistical analyses. Data of 1,078 women were divided into two parts. In the first halved sample (n=578), an exploratory factor analysis was conducted for the CTS1 items after exluding nine items with extremely low prevalence. It revealed 2-factor or 3-factor models. Then, we conducted a model comparison with the second halved sample (n=500), using confirmatory factor analysis. In terms of goodness-of-fit indeces, the 2-factor model was superior. Its subscales were Reasoning and Psycholosical Aggression 
520 |a CONCLUSION: The 2-factor model of the CTS1 consisting of Reasoning and Psychological Aggression was superior to the 3-factor model. This is not inconsistent with the original authors' theoretical model 
650 4 |a Journal Article 
650 4 |a Child abuse 
650 4 |a Factor analysis 
650 4 |a Perinatal care 
650 4 |a Psychometric testing 
650 4 |a Infant 
700 1 |a Takauma, Fumie  |c Rn  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Tada, Katsuhiko  |c PhD  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Tanaka, Tomoko  |c Rn  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Sakanashi, Kyoko  |c Ms  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Kataoka, Yaeko  |c PhD  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Kitamura, Toshinori  |c PhD  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t International journal of community based nursing and midwifery  |d 2014  |g 5(2017), 3 vom: 22. Juli, Seite 239-247  |w (DE-627)NLM243102372  |x 2322-2476  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:5  |g year:2017  |g number:3  |g day:22  |g month:07  |g pages:239-247 
912 |a GBV_USEFLAG_A 
912 |a SYSFLAG_A 
912 |a GBV_NLM 
912 |a GBV_ILN_11 
912 |a GBV_ILN_22 
912 |a GBV_ILN_24 
912 |a GBV_ILN_31 
912 |a GBV_ILN_40 
912 |a GBV_ILN_50 
912 |a GBV_ILN_61 
912 |a GBV_ILN_62 
912 |a GBV_ILN_72 
912 |a GBV_ILN_138 
912 |a GBV_ILN_271 
912 |a GBV_ILN_285 
912 |a GBV_ILN_288 
912 |a GBV_ILN_350 
951 |a AR 
952 |d 5  |j 2017  |e 3  |b 22  |c 07  |h 239-247