|
|
|
|
| LEADER |
01000naa a22002652 4500 |
| 001 |
NLM27285302X |
| 003 |
DE-627 |
| 005 |
20231224235755.0 |
| 007 |
cr uuu---uuuuu |
| 008 |
231224s2017 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c |
| 024 |
7 |
|
|a 10.1177/0734242X17709911
|2 doi
|
| 028 |
5 |
2 |
|a pubmed24n0909.xml
|
| 035 |
|
|
|a (DE-627)NLM27285302X
|
| 035 |
|
|
|a (NLM)28606005
|
| 040 |
|
|
|a DE-627
|b ger
|c DE-627
|e rakwb
|
| 041 |
|
|
|a eng
|
| 100 |
1 |
|
|a Tot, Bojana
|e verfasserin
|4 aut
|
| 245 |
1 |
0 |
|a Group assessment of key indicators of sustainable waste management in developing countries
|
| 264 |
|
1 |
|c 2017
|
| 336 |
|
|
|a Text
|b txt
|2 rdacontent
|
| 337 |
|
|
|a ƒaComputermedien
|b c
|2 rdamedia
|
| 338 |
|
|
|a ƒa Online-Ressource
|b cr
|2 rdacarrier
|
| 500 |
|
|
|a Date Completed 04.12.2017
|
| 500 |
|
|
|a Date Revised 02.12.2018
|
| 500 |
|
|
|a published: Print-Electronic
|
| 500 |
|
|
|a Citation Status MEDLINE
|
| 520 |
|
|
|a Decision makers in developing countries are struggling to solve the present problems of solid waste management. Prioritisation and ranking of the most important indicators that influence the waste management system is very useful for any decision maker for the future planning and implementation of a sustainable waste management system. The aim of this study is to evaluate key indicators and their related sub-indicators in a group decision-making environment. In order to gain insight into the subject it was necessary to obtain the qualified opinions of decision makers from different countries who understand the situation in the sector of waste management in developing countries. An assessment is performed by 43 decision makers from both developed and developing countries, and the applied methodology is based on a combined use of the analytic hierarchy process, from the multi-criteria decision-making set of tools, and the preferential voting method known as Borda Count, which belongs to social choice theory. Pairwise comparison of indicators is performed with the analytic hierarchy process, and the ranking of indicators once obtained is assessed with Borda Count. Detailed analysis of the final results showed that the Institutional-Administrative indicator was the most important one, with the maximum weight as derived by both groups of decision makers. The results also showed that the combined use of the analytic hierarchy process and Borda Count contributes to the credibility and objectivity of the decision-making process, allowing its use in more complex waste management group decision-making problems to be recommended
|
| 650 |
|
4 |
|a Journal Article
|
| 650 |
|
4 |
|a Borda count
|
| 650 |
|
4 |
|a Solid waste
|
| 650 |
|
4 |
|a analytic hierarchy process
|
| 650 |
|
4 |
|a group decision-making
|
| 650 |
|
4 |
|a indicators for assessing management strategies
|
| 650 |
|
7 |
|a Solid Waste
|2 NLM
|
| 700 |
1 |
|
|a Vujić, Goran
|e verfasserin
|4 aut
|
| 700 |
1 |
|
|a Srđević, Zorica
|e verfasserin
|4 aut
|
| 700 |
1 |
|
|a Ubavin, Dejan
|e verfasserin
|4 aut
|
| 700 |
1 |
|
|a Russo, Mário Augusto Tavares
|e verfasserin
|4 aut
|
| 773 |
0 |
8 |
|i Enthalten in
|t Waste management & research : the journal of the International Solid Wastes and Public Cleansing Association, ISWA
|d 1991
|g 35(2017), 9 vom: 15. Sept., Seite 913-922
|w (DE-627)NLM098164791
|x 1096-3669
|7 nnns
|
| 773 |
1 |
8 |
|g volume:35
|g year:2017
|g number:9
|g day:15
|g month:09
|g pages:913-922
|
| 856 |
4 |
0 |
|u http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0734242X17709911
|3 Volltext
|
| 912 |
|
|
|a GBV_USEFLAG_A
|
| 912 |
|
|
|a SYSFLAG_A
|
| 912 |
|
|
|a GBV_NLM
|
| 912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_350
|
| 951 |
|
|
|a AR
|
| 952 |
|
|
|d 35
|j 2017
|e 9
|b 15
|c 09
|h 913-922
|