The Relationship of Socio-Demographic Factors, Fertility Behavior and Child's Perceived Value with Fertility

BACKGROUND: Fertility intention is one of the strongest predictors of couple's fertility behavior that is affected by many variables. This study aimed to identify the relationship of socio-demographic factors, fertility behavior, and child's perceived value with fertility intention of wome...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International journal of community based nursing and midwifery. - 2014. - 5(2017), 2 vom: 04. Apr., Seite 123-133
1. Verfasser: Azmoude, Elham Ms (VerfasserIn)
Weitere Verfasser: Behnam, Haniye Bs, Barati-Far, Saeede Bs, Kabirian, Maryam Ms
Format: Aufsatz
Sprache:English
Veröffentlicht: 2017
Zugriff auf das übergeordnete Werk:International journal of community based nursing and midwifery
Schlagworte:Journal Article Demography Intention Reproduction Women Fertility
LEADER 01000naa a22002652 4500
001 NLM270963766
003 DE-627
005 20231224231704.0
007 tu
008 231224s2017 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c
028 5 2 |a pubmed24n0903.xml 
035 |a (DE-627)NLM270963766 
035 |a (NLM)28409166 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rakwb 
041 |a eng 
100 1 |a Azmoude, Elham  |c Ms  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
245 1 4 |a The Relationship of Socio-Demographic Factors, Fertility Behavior and Child's Perceived Value with Fertility 
264 1 |c 2017 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen  |b n  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Band  |b nc  |2 rdacarrier 
500 |a Date Revised 30.09.2020 
500 |a published: Print 
500 |a Citation Status PubMed-not-MEDLINE 
520 |a BACKGROUND: Fertility intention is one of the strongest predictors of couple's fertility behavior that is affected by many variables. This study aimed to identify the relationship of socio-demographic factors, fertility behavior, and child's perceived value with fertility intention of women in a region in the east Iran 
520 |a METHODS: In this descriptive cross-sectional study, 241 married women aged between 15 and 49 years of Torbat Heydariyeh City in 2015, were studied. The data collection scales included a demographic information form, fertility information questionnaire and Trommsdorff's child value questionnaire. Data were analyzed using SPSS 16 by Chi-square, Kruskal-Wallis, t-independent test and logistic regression. The significance level of P<0.05 was considered 
520 |a RESULTS: Most of the subjects (52.7%) had no fertility intention. Independent-samples test and Kruskal-Wallis revealed significant differences in fertility intention with the subject's age, mate's age, number of children and costs of children (P=0.001). In addition, in subjects with children of both sexes, intention for childbearing was significantly lower when compared to subjects with only one sex in children (P=0.001). However, when the logistic regression test was performed, being housewife, number of children, having children of both sexes, benefit and costs of children showed statistical significance (P<0.05) 
520 |a CONCLUSION: The results indicate that being housewife, number of current children, having children of both sexes, and perceived childbearing costs are important in determining the odds that a woman will intend to have a child. These findings can contribute to the realization of new population programs towards higher fertility rate in the country 
650 4 |a Journal Article 
650 4 |a Demography 
650 4 |a Intention 
650 4 |a Reproduction 
650 4 |a Women 
650 4 |a Fertility 
700 1 |a Behnam, Haniye  |c Bs  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Barati-Far, Saeede  |c Bs  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Kabirian, Maryam  |c Ms  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t International journal of community based nursing and midwifery  |d 2014  |g 5(2017), 2 vom: 04. Apr., Seite 123-133  |w (DE-627)NLM243102372  |x 2322-2476  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:5  |g year:2017  |g number:2  |g day:04  |g month:04  |g pages:123-133 
912 |a GBV_USEFLAG_A 
912 |a SYSFLAG_A 
912 |a GBV_NLM 
912 |a GBV_ILN_11 
912 |a GBV_ILN_22 
912 |a GBV_ILN_24 
912 |a GBV_ILN_31 
912 |a GBV_ILN_40 
912 |a GBV_ILN_50 
912 |a GBV_ILN_61 
912 |a GBV_ILN_62 
912 |a GBV_ILN_72 
912 |a GBV_ILN_138 
912 |a GBV_ILN_271 
912 |a GBV_ILN_285 
912 |a GBV_ILN_288 
912 |a GBV_ILN_350 
951 |a AR 
952 |d 5  |j 2017  |e 2  |b 04  |c 04  |h 123-133