Comparison of different measurement methods of odour and odorants used in the odour impact assessment of wastewater treatment plants in Poland

The aim of this study was to compare sensory and analytical methods used to measure odour and odorants concentrations for odour impact assessment on municipal wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs). A range of sources and odour or odorants concentrations were used to compare the methods. Four different...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research. - 1986. - 75(2017), 3-4 vom: 21. Feb., Seite 944-951
1. Verfasser: Barczak, Radosław J (VerfasserIn)
Weitere Verfasser: Kulig, Andrzej
Format: Online-Aufsatz
Sprache:English
Veröffentlicht: 2017
Zugriff auf das übergeordnete Werk:Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research
Schlagworte:Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't Waste Water Hydrogen Sulfide YY9FVM7NSN
LEADER 01000caa a22002652 4500
001 NLM269264116
003 DE-627
005 20250221071132.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 231224s2017 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.2166/wst.2016.560  |2 doi 
028 5 2 |a pubmed25n0897.xml 
035 |a (DE-627)NLM269264116 
035 |a (NLM)28234294 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rakwb 
041 |a eng 
100 1 |a Barczak, Radosław J  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Comparison of different measurement methods of odour and odorants used in the odour impact assessment of wastewater treatment plants in Poland 
264 1 |c 2017 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a ƒaComputermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a ƒa Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
500 |a Date Completed 26.06.2017 
500 |a Date Revised 07.12.2022 
500 |a published: Print 
500 |a Citation Status MEDLINE 
520 |a The aim of this study was to compare sensory and analytical methods used to measure odour and odorants concentrations for odour impact assessment on municipal wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs). A range of sources and odour or odorants concentrations were used to compare the methods. Four different odours and odorants measurement methods were compared: field olfactometry using Nasal Ranger® field olfactometer, dynamic olfactometry according to PN-EN 13725:2007 standard, colorimetric assays (hydrogen sulphide, ammonia) and gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) methods (methanethiol, ethanethiol, dimethyl sulphide). Mechanical-biological and mechanical-biological-chemical WWTPs were chosen. Receptor points were selected inside of 'closed' facilities of the technological line (screening rooms, mechanical thickening and dewatering building) and downwind at 'open' facilities (collection chambers, sand trap, mechanical thickeners) which were the most significant regarding the potential for odour nuisance. By the research, it is not possible to specify explicit dependencies between results obtained from different research methods used in the odour impact assessment of WWTPs. A strong correlation (Pearson's correlation coefficient was equal R = 0.79) was determined only once between odour concentrations measured by dynamic olfactometry and methanethiol concentrations in the screen room at the WWTP No. 3 
650 4 |a Journal Article 
650 4 |a Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't 
650 7 |a Waste Water  |2 NLM 
650 7 |a Hydrogen Sulfide  |2 NLM 
650 7 |a YY9FVM7NSN  |2 NLM 
700 1 |a Kulig, Andrzej  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research  |d 1986  |g 75(2017), 3-4 vom: 21. Feb., Seite 944-951  |w (DE-627)NLM098149431  |x 0273-1223  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:75  |g year:2017  |g number:3-4  |g day:21  |g month:02  |g pages:944-951 
856 4 0 |u http://dx.doi.org/10.2166/wst.2016.560  |3 Volltext 
912 |a GBV_USEFLAG_A 
912 |a SYSFLAG_A 
912 |a GBV_NLM 
912 |a GBV_ILN_350 
951 |a AR 
952 |d 75  |j 2017  |e 3-4  |b 21  |c 02  |h 944-951