|
|
|
|
LEADER |
01000caa a22002652 4500 |
001 |
NLM266888534 |
003 |
DE-627 |
005 |
20250221000210.0 |
007 |
cr uuu---uuuuu |
008 |
231224s2017 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c |
024 |
7 |
|
|a 10.1111/cobi.12875
|2 doi
|
028 |
5 |
2 |
|a pubmed25n0889.xml
|
035 |
|
|
|a (DE-627)NLM266888534
|
035 |
|
|
|a (NLM)27925351
|
040 |
|
|
|a DE-627
|b ger
|c DE-627
|e rakwb
|
041 |
|
|
|a eng
|
100 |
1 |
|
|a Nielsen, Erica S
|e verfasserin
|4 aut
|
245 |
1 |
0 |
|a Multispecies genetic objectives in spatial conservation planning
|
264 |
|
1 |
|c 2017
|
336 |
|
|
|a Text
|b txt
|2 rdacontent
|
337 |
|
|
|a ƒaComputermedien
|b c
|2 rdamedia
|
338 |
|
|
|a ƒa Online-Ressource
|b cr
|2 rdacarrier
|
500 |
|
|
|a Date Completed 04.01.2018
|
500 |
|
|
|a Date Revised 02.12.2018
|
500 |
|
|
|a published: Print-Electronic
|
500 |
|
|
|a Citation Status MEDLINE
|
520 |
|
|
|a © 2016 Society for Conservation Biology.
|
520 |
|
|
|a Growing threats to biodiversity and global alteration of habitats and species distributions make it increasingly necessary to consider evolutionary patterns in conservation decision making. Yet, there is no clear-cut guidance on how genetic features can be incorporated into conservation-planning processes, despite multiple molecular markers and several genetic metrics for each marker type to choose from. Genetic patterns differ between species, but the potential tradeoffs among genetic objectives for multiple species in conservation planning are currently understudied. We compared spatial conservation prioritizations derived from 2 metrics of genetic diversity (nucleotide and haplotype diversity) and 2 metrics of genetic isolation (private haplotypes and local genetic differentiation) in mitochondrial DNA of 5 marine species. We compared outcomes of conservation plans based only on habitat representation with plans based on genetic data and habitat representation. Fewer priority areas were selected for conservation plans based solely on habitat representation than on plans that included habitat and genetic data. All 4 genetic metrics selected approximately similar conservation-priority areas, which is likely a result of prioritizing genetic patterns across a genetically diverse array of species. Largely, our results suggest that multispecies genetic conservation objectives are vital to creating protected-area networks that appropriately preserve community-level evolutionary patterns
|
650 |
|
4 |
|a Journal Article
|
650 |
|
4 |
|a Marxan
|
650 |
|
4 |
|a aislamiento genético
|
650 |
|
4 |
|a conservation genetics
|
650 |
|
4 |
|a diversidad genética
|
650 |
|
4 |
|a ecología intermareal
|
650 |
|
4 |
|a genetic diversity
|
650 |
|
4 |
|a genetic isolation
|
650 |
|
4 |
|a genética de la conservación
|
650 |
|
4 |
|a intertidal ecology
|
650 |
|
4 |
|a priorización espacial
|
650 |
|
4 |
|a spatial prioritization
|
700 |
1 |
|
|a Beger, Maria
|e verfasserin
|4 aut
|
700 |
1 |
|
|a Henriques, Romina
|e verfasserin
|4 aut
|
700 |
1 |
|
|a Selkoe, Kimberly A
|e verfasserin
|4 aut
|
700 |
1 |
|
|a von der Heyden, Sophie
|e verfasserin
|4 aut
|
773 |
0 |
8 |
|i Enthalten in
|t Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology
|d 1989
|g 31(2017), 4 vom: 09. Aug., Seite 872-882
|w (DE-627)NLM098176803
|x 1523-1739
|7 nnns
|
773 |
1 |
8 |
|g volume:31
|g year:2017
|g number:4
|g day:09
|g month:08
|g pages:872-882
|
856 |
4 |
0 |
|u http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cobi.12875
|3 Volltext
|
912 |
|
|
|a GBV_USEFLAG_A
|
912 |
|
|
|a SYSFLAG_A
|
912 |
|
|
|a GBV_NLM
|
912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_350
|
951 |
|
|
|a AR
|
952 |
|
|
|d 31
|j 2017
|e 4
|b 09
|c 08
|h 872-882
|