Social preferences for the design of biodiversity offsets for shorebirds in Australia

© 2016 Society for Conservation Biology.

Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology. - 1989. - 31(2017), 4 vom: 08. Aug., Seite 828-836
1. Verfasser: Rogers, Abbie A (VerfasserIn)
Weitere Verfasser: Burton, Michael P
Format: Online-Aufsatz
Sprache:English
Veröffentlicht: 2017
Zugriff auf das übergeordnete Werk:Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology
Schlagworte:Journal Article aceptación comunitaria aves costeras migratorias choice experiment community acceptance experimento de opción migratory shorebirds nonmarket valuation offset policy política de compensaciones valoración no comercial
LEADER 01000caa a22002652c 4500
001 NLM26688816X
003 DE-627
005 20250221000205.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 231224s2017 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1111/cobi.12874  |2 doi 
028 5 2 |a pubmed25n0889.xml 
035 |a (DE-627)NLM26688816X 
035 |a (NLM)27925315 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rakwb 
041 |a eng 
100 1 |a Rogers, Abbie A  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Social preferences for the design of biodiversity offsets for shorebirds in Australia 
264 1 |c 2017 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a ƒaComputermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a ƒa Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
500 |a Date Completed 04.01.2018 
500 |a Date Revised 02.12.2018 
500 |a published: Print-Electronic 
500 |a Citation Status MEDLINE 
520 |a © 2016 Society for Conservation Biology. 
520 |a Understanding the social acceptability of biodiversity offsets is important to the design of offset policy. We used a discrete choice experiment to quantify preferences of Australians for a migratory shorebird offset in the context of an oil and gas development project. We surveyed a nationally representative sample of 1371 respondents on their preferences for current and prospective offset-policy characteristics via an online questionnaire to inform policy design of the social dimensions related to offset acceptability. The majority of respondents accepted offsetting as a means to allow economic development; the option to reject development (and an offset) was selected in 13% of possible offset scenarios. Substituting protection of a species affected by the development with protection of a more endangered species was a desirable policy characteristic, as was having the offset implemented by a third party or the government rather than the company responsible for the development. Direct offset activities (e.g., improving degraded habitat) were preferred over indirect activities (e.g., a research program), and respondents were strongly against locating the offset at a site other than where the impact occurred. Positive and negative characteristics of offsets could be traded off by changing the number of birds protected by the offset. Our results show that Australians are likely to support increased flexibility in biodiversity-offset policies, particularly when undesirable policy characteristics are compensated for 
650 4 |a Journal Article 
650 4 |a aceptación comunitaria 
650 4 |a aves costeras migratorias 
650 4 |a choice experiment 
650 4 |a community acceptance 
650 4 |a experimento de opción 
650 4 |a migratory shorebirds 
650 4 |a nonmarket valuation 
650 4 |a offset policy 
650 4 |a política de compensaciones 
650 4 |a valoración no comercial 
700 1 |a Burton, Michael P  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology  |d 1989  |g 31(2017), 4 vom: 08. Aug., Seite 828-836  |w (DE-627)NLM098176803  |x 1523-1739  |7 nnas 
773 1 8 |g volume:31  |g year:2017  |g number:4  |g day:08  |g month:08  |g pages:828-836 
856 4 0 |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cobi.12874  |3 Volltext 
912 |a GBV_USEFLAG_A 
912 |a SYSFLAG_A 
912 |a GBV_NLM 
912 |a GBV_ILN_350 
951 |a AR 
952 |d 31  |j 2017  |e 4  |b 08  |c 08  |h 828-836