Pampered inside, pestered outside? Differences and similarities between plants growing in controlled conditions and in the field

© 2016 The Authors. New Phytologist © 2016 New Phytologist Trust.

Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The New phytologist. - 1979. - 212(2016), 4 vom: 15. Dez., Seite 838-855
1. Verfasser: Poorter, Hendrik (VerfasserIn)
Weitere Verfasser: Fiorani, Fabio, Pieruschka, Roland, Wojciechowski, Tobias, van der Putten, Wim H, Kleyer, Michael, Schurr, Uli, Postma, Johannes
Format: Online-Aufsatz
Sprache:English
Veröffentlicht: 2016
Zugriff auf das übergeordnete Werk:The New phytologist
Schlagworte:Journal Article Review daily light integral (DLI) glasshouse growth chamber photothermal ratio plant density plant growth
LEADER 01000naa a22002652 4500
001 NLM26566926X
003 DE-627
005 20231224212806.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 231224s2016 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1111/nph.14243  |2 doi 
028 5 2 |a pubmed24n0885.xml 
035 |a (DE-627)NLM26566926X 
035 |a (NLM)27783423 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rakwb 
041 |a eng 
100 1 |a Poorter, Hendrik  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Pampered inside, pestered outside? Differences and similarities between plants growing in controlled conditions and in the field 
264 1 |c 2016 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a ƒaComputermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a ƒa Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
500 |a Date Completed 05.02.2018 
500 |a Date Revised 08.04.2022 
500 |a published: Print-Electronic 
500 |a Citation Status MEDLINE 
520 |a © 2016 The Authors. New Phytologist © 2016 New Phytologist Trust. 
520 |a I. 839 II. 839 III. 841 IV. 845 V. 847 VI. 848 VII. 849 VIII. 851 851 852 References 852 Appendix A1 854 SUMMARY: Plant biologists often grow plants in growth chambers or glasshouses with the ultimate aim to understand or improve plant performance in the field. What is often overlooked is how results from controlled conditions translate back to field situations. A meta-analysis showed that lab-grown plants had faster growth rates, higher nitrogen concentrations and different morphology. They remained smaller, however, because the lab plants had grown for a much shorter time. We compared glasshouse and growth chamber conditions with those in the field and found that the ratio between the daily amount of light and daily temperature (photothermal ratio) was consistently lower under controlled conditions. This may strongly affect a plant's source : sink ratio and hence its overall morphology and physiology. Plants in the field also grow at higher plant densities. A second meta-analysis showed that a doubling in density leads on average to 34% smaller plants with strong negative effects on tiller or side-shoot formation but little effect on plant height. We found the r2 between lab and field phenotypic data to be rather modest (0.26). Based on these insights, we discuss various alternatives to facilitate the translation from lab results to the field, including several options to apply growth regimes closer to field conditions 
650 4 |a Journal Article 
650 4 |a Review 
650 4 |a daily light integral (DLI) 
650 4 |a glasshouse 
650 4 |a growth chamber 
650 4 |a photothermal ratio 
650 4 |a plant density 
650 4 |a plant growth 
700 1 |a Fiorani, Fabio  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Pieruschka, Roland  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Wojciechowski, Tobias  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a van der Putten, Wim H  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Kleyer, Michael  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Schurr, Uli  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Postma, Johannes  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t The New phytologist  |d 1979  |g 212(2016), 4 vom: 15. Dez., Seite 838-855  |w (DE-627)NLM09818248X  |x 1469-8137  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:212  |g year:2016  |g number:4  |g day:15  |g month:12  |g pages:838-855 
856 4 0 |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/nph.14243  |3 Volltext 
912 |a GBV_USEFLAG_A 
912 |a SYSFLAG_A 
912 |a GBV_NLM 
912 |a GBV_ILN_350 
951 |a AR 
952 |d 212  |j 2016  |e 4  |b 15  |c 12  |h 838-855