Quantitative option analysis for implementation and management of landfills

© The Author(s) 2016.

Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Waste management & research : the journal of the International Solid Wastes and Public Cleansing Association, ISWA. - 1991. - 34(2016), 9 vom: 29. Sept., Seite 905-11
1. Verfasser: Kerestecioğlu, Merih (VerfasserIn)
Format: Online-Aufsatz
Sprache:English
Veröffentlicht: 2016
Zugriff auf das übergeordnete Werk:Waste management & research : the journal of the International Solid Wastes and Public Cleansing Association, ISWA
Schlagworte:Journal Article Landfill management investment strategy option analysis public private partnership risk assessment solid waste management strategy
LEADER 01000caa a22002652 4500
001 NLM261854747
003 DE-627
005 20250220081957.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 231224s2016 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1177/0734242X16652959  |2 doi 
028 5 2 |a pubmed25n0872.xml 
035 |a (DE-627)NLM261854747 
035 |a (NLM)27354014 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rakwb 
041 |a eng 
100 1 |a Kerestecioğlu, Merih  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Quantitative option analysis for implementation and management of landfills 
264 1 |c 2016 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a ƒaComputermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a ƒa Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
500 |a Date Completed 13.04.2017 
500 |a Date Revised 13.04.2017 
500 |a published: Print-Electronic 
500 |a Citation Status MEDLINE 
520 |a © The Author(s) 2016. 
520 |a The selection of the most feasible strategy for implementation of landfills is a challenging step. Potential implementation options of landfills cover a wide range, from conventional construction contracts to the concessions. Montenegro, seeking to improve the efficiency of the public services while maintaining affordability, was considering privatisation as a way to reduce public spending on service provision. In this study, to determine the most feasible model for construction and operation of a regional landfill, a quantitative risk analysis was implemented with four steps: (i) development of a global risk matrix; (ii) assignment of qualitative probabilities of occurrences and magnitude of impacts; (iii) determination of the risks to be mitigated, monitored, controlled or ignored; (iv) reduction of the main risk elements; and (v) incorporation of quantitative estimates of probability of occurrence and expected impact for each risk element in the reduced risk matrix. The evaluated scenarios were: (i) construction and operation of the regional landfill by the public sector; (ii) construction and operation of the landfill by private sector and transfer of the ownership to the public sector after a pre-defined period; and (iii) operation of the landfill by the private sector, without ownership. The quantitative risk assessment concluded that introduction of a public private partnership is not the most feasible option, unlike the common belief in several public institutions in developing countries. A management contract for the first years of operation was advised to be implemented, after which, a long term operating contract may follow 
650 4 |a Journal Article 
650 4 |a Landfill management 
650 4 |a investment strategy 
650 4 |a option analysis 
650 4 |a public private partnership 
650 4 |a risk assessment 
650 4 |a solid waste management strategy 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Waste management & research : the journal of the International Solid Wastes and Public Cleansing Association, ISWA  |d 1991  |g 34(2016), 9 vom: 29. Sept., Seite 905-11  |w (DE-627)NLM098164791  |x 1096-3669  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:34  |g year:2016  |g number:9  |g day:29  |g month:09  |g pages:905-11 
856 4 0 |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0734242X16652959  |3 Volltext 
912 |a GBV_USEFLAG_A 
912 |a SYSFLAG_A 
912 |a GBV_NLM 
912 |a GBV_ILN_350 
951 |a AR 
952 |d 34  |j 2016  |e 9  |b 29  |c 09  |h 905-11