No evidence of general CO2 insensitivity in ferns : one stomatal control mechanism for all land plants?

© 2016 The Authors. New Phytologist © 2016 New Phytologist Trust.

Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The New phytologist. - 1990. - 211(2016), 3 vom: 04. Aug., Seite 819-27
1. Verfasser: Franks, Peter J (VerfasserIn)
Weitere Verfasser: Britton-Harper, Zoe J
Format: Online-Aufsatz
Sprache:English
Veröffentlicht: 2016
Zugriff auf das übergeordnete Werk:The New phytologist
Schlagworte:Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't CO2 global climate change stomata stomatal control stomatal evolution stomatal model stomatal signalling vegetation models mehr... Water 059QF0KO0R Carbon Dioxide 142M471B3J
LEADER 01000caa a22002652 4500
001 NLM260652024
003 DE-627
005 20250220050242.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 231224s2016 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1111/nph.14020  |2 doi 
028 5 2 |a pubmed25n0868.xml 
035 |a (DE-627)NLM260652024 
035 |a (NLM)27214852 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rakwb 
041 |a eng 
100 1 |a Franks, Peter J  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a No evidence of general CO2 insensitivity in ferns  |b one stomatal control mechanism for all land plants? 
264 1 |c 2016 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a ƒaComputermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a ƒa Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
500 |a Date Completed 30.01.2018 
500 |a Date Revised 30.09.2020 
500 |a published: Print-Electronic 
500 |a CommentIn: New Phytol. 2016 Aug;211(3):767-70. doi: 10.1111/nph.14074. - PMID 27397524 
500 |a Citation Status MEDLINE 
520 |a © 2016 The Authors. New Phytologist © 2016 New Phytologist Trust. 
520 |a Stomatal regulation of plant carbon uptake and water loss under changing environmental conditions was a crucial evolutionary step in the colonization of land by plants. There are currently two conflicting models describing the nature of stomatal regulation across terrestrial vascular plants: the first is characterized by a fundamental mechanistic similarity across all lineages, and the second is characterized by the evolution of major differences in angiosperms compared with more ancient lineages. Specifically, the second model posits that stomata of ferns lack a response to elevated atmospheric CO2 concentration (ca ) and therefore cannot regulate leaf intercellular CO2 concentration (ci ). We compared stomatal sensitivity to changes in ca in three distantly related fern species and a representative angiosperm species. Fern and angiosperm stomata responded strongly and similarly to changes in ca . As a result, ci /ca was maintained within narrow limits during ca changes. Our results challenge the model in which stomata of ferns generally lack a response to elevated ca and that angiosperms evolved new dynamic mechanisms for regulating leaf gas exchange that differ fundamentally from ferns. Instead, the results are consistent with a universal stomatal control mechanism that is fundamentally conserved across ferns and angiosperms, and therefore likely all vascular plant divisions 
650 4 |a Journal Article 
650 4 |a Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't 
650 4 |a CO2 
650 4 |a global climate change 
650 4 |a stomata 
650 4 |a stomatal control 
650 4 |a stomatal evolution 
650 4 |a stomatal model 
650 4 |a stomatal signalling 
650 4 |a vegetation models 
650 7 |a Water  |2 NLM 
650 7 |a 059QF0KO0R  |2 NLM 
650 7 |a Carbon Dioxide  |2 NLM 
650 7 |a 142M471B3J  |2 NLM 
700 1 |a Britton-Harper, Zoe J  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t The New phytologist  |d 1990  |g 211(2016), 3 vom: 04. Aug., Seite 819-27  |w (DE-627)NLM09818248X  |x 1469-8137  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:211  |g year:2016  |g number:3  |g day:04  |g month:08  |g pages:819-27 
856 4 0 |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/nph.14020  |3 Volltext 
912 |a GBV_USEFLAG_A 
912 |a SYSFLAG_A 
912 |a GBV_NLM 
912 |a GBV_ILN_350 
951 |a AR 
952 |d 211  |j 2016  |e 3  |b 04  |c 08  |h 819-27