Bud break responds more strongly to daytime than night-time temperature under asymmetric experimental warming

© 2016 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Global change biology. - 1999. - 23(2017), 1 vom: 18. Jan., Seite 446-454
1. Verfasser: Rossi, Sergio (VerfasserIn)
Weitere Verfasser: Isabel, Nathalie
Format: Online-Aufsatz
Sprache:English
Veröffentlicht: 2017
Zugriff auf das übergeordnete Werk:Global change biology
Schlagworte:Journal Article Picea mariana bud burst climate change ecotype maximum temperature minimum temperature phenology
LEADER 01000naa a22002652 4500
001 NLM260510351
003 DE-627
005 20231224193545.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 231224s2017 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1111/gcb.13360  |2 doi 
028 5 2 |a pubmed24n0868.xml 
035 |a (DE-627)NLM260510351 
035 |a (NLM)27196979 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rakwb 
041 |a eng 
100 1 |a Rossi, Sergio  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Bud break responds more strongly to daytime than night-time temperature under asymmetric experimental warming 
264 1 |c 2017 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a ƒaComputermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a ƒa Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
500 |a Date Completed 23.10.2017 
500 |a Date Revised 02.12.2018 
500 |a published: Print-Electronic 
500 |a Citation Status MEDLINE 
520 |a © 2016 John Wiley & Sons Ltd. 
520 |a Global warming is diurnally asymmetric, leading to a less cold, rather than warmer, climate. We investigated the effects of asymmetric experimental warming on plant phenology by testing the hypothesis that daytime warming is more effective in advancing bud break than night-time warming. Bud break was monitored daily in Picea mariana seedlings belonging to 20 provenances from Eastern Canada and subjected to daytime and night-time warming in growth chambers at temperatures varying between 8 and 16 °C. The higher advancements of bud break and shorter times required to complete the phenological phases occurred with daytime warming. Seedlings responded to night-time warming, but still with less advancement of bud break than under daytime warming. No advancement was observed when night-time warming was associated with a daytime cooling. The effect of the treatments was uniform across provenances. Our observations realized under controlled conditions allowed to experimentally demonstrate that bud break can advance under night-time warming, but to a lesser extent than under daytime warming. Prediction models using daily timescales could neglect the diverging influence of asymmetric warming and should be recalibrated for higher temporal resolutions 
650 4 |a Journal Article 
650 4 |a Picea mariana 
650 4 |a bud burst 
650 4 |a climate change 
650 4 |a ecotype 
650 4 |a maximum temperature 
650 4 |a minimum temperature 
650 4 |a phenology 
700 1 |a Isabel, Nathalie  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Global change biology  |d 1999  |g 23(2017), 1 vom: 18. Jan., Seite 446-454  |w (DE-627)NLM098239996  |x 1365-2486  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:23  |g year:2017  |g number:1  |g day:18  |g month:01  |g pages:446-454 
856 4 0 |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/gcb.13360  |3 Volltext 
912 |a GBV_USEFLAG_A 
912 |a SYSFLAG_A 
912 |a GBV_NLM 
912 |a GBV_ILN_350 
951 |a AR 
952 |d 23  |j 2017  |e 1  |b 18  |c 01  |h 446-454