|
|
|
|
| LEADER |
01000naa a22002652 4500 |
| 001 |
NLM259034711 |
| 003 |
DE-627 |
| 005 |
20231224190320.0 |
| 007 |
cr uuu---uuuuu |
| 008 |
231224s2016 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c |
| 024 |
7 |
|
|a 10.1111/cobi.12730
|2 doi
|
| 028 |
5 |
2 |
|a pubmed24n0863.xml
|
| 035 |
|
|
|a (DE-627)NLM259034711
|
| 035 |
|
|
|a (NLM)27040452
|
| 040 |
|
|
|a DE-627
|b ger
|c DE-627
|e rakwb
|
| 041 |
|
|
|a eng
|
| 100 |
1 |
|
|a Ikin, Karen
|e verfasserin
|4 aut
|
| 245 |
1 |
0 |
|a Evaluating complementary networks of restoration plantings for landscape-scale occurrence of temporally dynamic species
|
| 264 |
|
1 |
|c 2016
|
| 336 |
|
|
|a Text
|b txt
|2 rdacontent
|
| 337 |
|
|
|a ƒaComputermedien
|b c
|2 rdamedia
|
| 338 |
|
|
|a ƒa Online-Ressource
|b cr
|2 rdacarrier
|
| 500 |
|
|
|a Date Completed 04.01.2018
|
| 500 |
|
|
|a Date Revised 02.12.2018
|
| 500 |
|
|
|a published: Print-Electronic
|
| 500 |
|
|
|a Citation Status MEDLINE
|
| 520 |
|
|
|a © 2016 Society for Conservation Biology.
|
| 520 |
|
|
|a Multibillion dollar investments in land restoration make it critical that conservation goals are achieved cost-effectively. Approaches developed for systematic conservation planning offer opportunities to evaluate landscape-scale, temporally dynamic biodiversity outcomes from restoration and improve on traditional approaches that focus on the most species-rich plantings. We investigated whether it is possible to apply a complementarity-based approach to evaluate the extent to which an existing network of restoration plantings meets representation targets. Using a case study of woodland birds of conservation concern in southeastern Australia, we compared complementarity-based selections of plantings based on temporally dynamic species occurrences with selections based on static species occurrences and selections based on ranking plantings by species richness. The dynamic complementarity approach, which incorporated species occurrences over 5 years, resulted in higher species occurrences and proportion of targets met compared with the static complementarity approach, in which species occurrences were taken at a single point in time. For equivalent cost, the dynamic complementarity approach also always resulted in higher average minimum percent occurrence of species maintained through time and a higher proportion of the bird community meeting representation targets compared with the species-richness approach. Plantings selected under the complementarity approaches represented the full range of planting attributes, whereas those selected under the species-richness approach were larger in size. Our results suggest that future restoration policy should not attempt to achieve all conservation goals within individual plantings, but should instead capitalize on restoration opportunities as they arise to achieve collective value of multiple plantings across the landscape. Networks of restoration plantings with complementary attributes of age, size, vegetation structure, and landscape context lead to considerably better outcomes than conventional restoration objectives of site-scale species richness and are crucial for allocating restoration investment wisely to reach desired conservation goals
|
| 650 |
|
4 |
|a Journal Article
|
| 650 |
|
4 |
|a Marxan
|
| 650 |
|
4 |
|a agrienvironmental schemes
|
| 650 |
|
4 |
|a aves de bosque
|
| 650 |
|
4 |
|a complementariedad
|
| 650 |
|
4 |
|a complementarity
|
| 650 |
|
4 |
|a distribuciones dinámicas
|
| 650 |
|
4 |
|a dynamic distributions
|
| 650 |
|
4 |
|a esquemas agroambientales
|
| 650 |
|
4 |
|a planeación sistemática de la conservación
|
| 650 |
|
4 |
|a priorización espacial
|
| 650 |
|
4 |
|a restauración de la vegetación
|
| 650 |
|
4 |
|a spatial prioritization
|
| 650 |
|
4 |
|a systematic conservation planning
|
| 650 |
|
4 |
|a vegetation restoration
|
| 650 |
|
4 |
|a woodland birds
|
| 700 |
1 |
|
|a Tulloch, Ayesha
|e verfasserin
|4 aut
|
| 700 |
1 |
|
|a Gibbons, Philip
|e verfasserin
|4 aut
|
| 700 |
1 |
|
|a Ansell, Dean
|e verfasserin
|4 aut
|
| 700 |
1 |
|
|a Seddon, Julian
|e verfasserin
|4 aut
|
| 700 |
1 |
|
|a Lindenmayer, David
|e verfasserin
|4 aut
|
| 773 |
0 |
8 |
|i Enthalten in
|t Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology
|d 1999
|g 30(2016), 5 vom: 04. Okt., Seite 1027-37
|w (DE-627)NLM098176803
|x 1523-1739
|7 nnns
|
| 773 |
1 |
8 |
|g volume:30
|g year:2016
|g number:5
|g day:04
|g month:10
|g pages:1027-37
|
| 856 |
4 |
0 |
|u http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cobi.12730
|3 Volltext
|
| 912 |
|
|
|a GBV_USEFLAG_A
|
| 912 |
|
|
|a SYSFLAG_A
|
| 912 |
|
|
|a GBV_NLM
|
| 912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_350
|
| 951 |
|
|
|a AR
|
| 952 |
|
|
|d 30
|j 2016
|e 5
|b 04
|c 10
|h 1027-37
|