Visual Object Tracking Performance Measures Revisited

The problem of visual tracking evaluation is sporting a large variety of performance measures, and largely suffers from lack of consensus about which measures should be used in experiments. This makes the cross-paper tracker comparison difficult. Furthermore, as some measures may be less effective t...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:IEEE transactions on image processing : a publication of the IEEE Signal Processing Society. - 1992. - 25(2016), 3 vom: 01. März, Seite 1261-74
1. Verfasser: Čehovin, Luka (VerfasserIn)
Weitere Verfasser: Leonardis, Aleš, Kristan, Matej
Format: Online-Aufsatz
Sprache:English
Veröffentlicht: 2016
Zugriff auf das übergeordnete Werk:IEEE transactions on image processing : a publication of the IEEE Signal Processing Society
Schlagworte:Journal Article
LEADER 01000naa a22002652 4500
001 NLM256855439
003 DE-627
005 20231224181549.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 231224s2016 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
028 5 2 |a pubmed24n0856.xml 
035 |a (DE-627)NLM256855439 
035 |a (NLM)26812723 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rakwb 
041 |a eng 
100 1 |a Čehovin, Luka  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Visual Object Tracking Performance Measures Revisited 
264 1 |c 2016 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a ƒaComputermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a ƒa Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
500 |a Date Completed 01.07.2016 
500 |a Date Revised 30.06.2016 
500 |a published: Print 
500 |a Citation Status PubMed-not-MEDLINE 
520 |a The problem of visual tracking evaluation is sporting a large variety of performance measures, and largely suffers from lack of consensus about which measures should be used in experiments. This makes the cross-paper tracker comparison difficult. Furthermore, as some measures may be less effective than others, the tracking results may be skewed or biased toward particular tracking aspects. In this paper, we revisit the popular performance measures and tracker performance visualizations and analyze them theoretically and experimentally. We show that several measures are equivalent from the point of information they provide for tracker comparison and, crucially, that some are more brittle than the others. Based on our analysis, we narrow down the set of potential measures to only two complementary ones, describing accuracy and robustness, thus pushing toward homogenization of the tracker evaluation methodology. These two measures can be intuitively interpreted and visualized and have been employed by the recent visual object tracking challenges as the foundation for the evaluation methodology 
650 4 |a Journal Article 
700 1 |a Leonardis, Aleš  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Kristan, Matej  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t IEEE transactions on image processing : a publication of the IEEE Signal Processing Society  |d 1992  |g 25(2016), 3 vom: 01. März, Seite 1261-74  |w (DE-627)NLM09821456X  |x 1941-0042  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:25  |g year:2016  |g number:3  |g day:01  |g month:03  |g pages:1261-74 
912 |a GBV_USEFLAG_A 
912 |a SYSFLAG_A 
912 |a GBV_NLM 
912 |a GBV_ILN_350 
951 |a AR 
952 |d 25  |j 2016  |e 3  |b 01  |c 03  |h 1261-74