Effects of threat management interactions on conservation priorities

© 2015 The Authors. Conservation Biology published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc., on behalf of Society for Conservation Biology.

Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology. - 1999. - 29(2015), 6 vom: 11. Dez., Seite 1626-35
1. Verfasser: Auerbach, Nancy A (VerfasserIn)
Weitere Verfasser: Wilson, Kerrie A, Tulloch, Ayesha I T, Rhodes, Jonathan R, Hanson, Jeffrey O, Possingham, Hugh P
Format: Online-Aufsatz
Sprache:English
Veröffentlicht: 2015
Zugriff auf das übergeordnete Werk:Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology
Schlagworte:Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't Australia acción de manejo action prioritization amenazas análisis de rentabilidad cost-effectiveness analysis especies amenazadas management action mehr... priorización de acción retorno de la inversión return on investment threatened species threats
LEADER 01000naa a22002652 4500
001 NLM25085385X
003 DE-627
005 20231224160726.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 231224s2015 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1111/cobi.12551  |2 doi 
028 5 2 |a pubmed24n0836.xml 
035 |a (DE-627)NLM25085385X 
035 |a (NLM)26171646 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rakwb 
041 |a eng 
100 1 |a Auerbach, Nancy A  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Effects of threat management interactions on conservation priorities 
264 1 |c 2015 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a ƒaComputermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a ƒa Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
500 |a Date Completed 07.10.2016 
500 |a Date Revised 30.12.2016 
500 |a published: Print-Electronic 
500 |a Citation Status MEDLINE 
520 |a © 2015 The Authors. Conservation Biology published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc., on behalf of Society for Conservation Biology. 
520 |a Decisions need to be made about which biodiversity management actions are undertaken to mitigate threats and about where these actions are implemented. However, management actions can interact; that is, the cost, benefit, and feasibility of one action can change when another action is undertaken. There is little guidance on how to explicitly and efficiently prioritize management for multiple threats, including deciding where to act. Integrated management could focus on one management action to abate a dominant threat or on a strategy comprising multiple actions to abate multiple threats. Furthermore management could be undertaken at sites that are in close proximity to reduce costs. We used cost-effectiveness analysis to prioritize investments in fire management, controlling invasive predators, and reducing grazing pressure in a bio-diverse region of southeastern Queensland, Australia. We compared outcomes of 5 management approaches based on different assumptions about interactions and quantified how investment needed, benefits expected, and the locations prioritized for implementation differed when interactions were taken into account. Managing for interactions altered decisions about where to invest and in which actions to invest and had the potential to deliver increased investment efficiency. Differences in high priority locations and actions were greatest between the approaches when we made different assumptions about how management actions deliver benefits through threat abatement: either all threats must be managed to conserve species or only one management action may be required. Threatened species management that does not consider interactions between actions may result in misplaced investments or misguided expectations of the effort required to mitigate threats to species 
650 4 |a Journal Article 
650 4 |a Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't 
650 4 |a Australia 
650 4 |a acción de manejo 
650 4 |a action prioritization 
650 4 |a amenazas 
650 4 |a análisis de rentabilidad 
650 4 |a cost-effectiveness analysis 
650 4 |a especies amenazadas 
650 4 |a management action 
650 4 |a priorización de acción 
650 4 |a retorno de la inversión 
650 4 |a return on investment 
650 4 |a threatened species 
650 4 |a threats 
700 1 |a Wilson, Kerrie A  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Tulloch, Ayesha I T  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Rhodes, Jonathan R  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Hanson, Jeffrey O  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Possingham, Hugh P  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology  |d 1999  |g 29(2015), 6 vom: 11. Dez., Seite 1626-35  |w (DE-627)NLM098176803  |x 1523-1739  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:29  |g year:2015  |g number:6  |g day:11  |g month:12  |g pages:1626-35 
856 4 0 |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cobi.12551  |3 Volltext 
912 |a GBV_USEFLAG_A 
912 |a SYSFLAG_A 
912 |a GBV_NLM 
912 |a GBV_ILN_350 
951 |a AR 
952 |d 29  |j 2015  |e 6  |b 11  |c 12  |h 1626-35