Quality and Diagnostic Utility of Mydriatic Smartphone Photography : The Smartphone Ophthalmoscopy Reliability Trial
Copyright 2015, SLACK Incorporated.
| Veröffentlicht in: | Ophthalmic surgery, lasers & imaging retina. - 2013. - 46(2015), 6 vom: 28. Juni, Seite 631-7 |
|---|---|
| 1. Verfasser: | |
| Weitere Verfasser: | , , , , , , |
| Format: | Online-Aufsatz |
| Sprache: | English |
| Veröffentlicht: |
2015
|
| Zugriff auf das übergeordnete Werk: | Ophthalmic surgery, lasers & imaging retina |
| Schlagworte: | Journal Article Randomized Controlled Trial Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't Mydriatics |
| Zusammenfassung: | Copyright 2015, SLACK Incorporated. BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Establish quality and diagnostic utility of mydriatic smartphone ophthalmoscopy (SO) fundus images compared to fundus camera (FC) images PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this prospective, cross-sectional study, 94 consecutive patients in an urban eye emergency department underwent SO and FC fundus imaging via one of three study arms: medical student 1 (MS1), medical student 2 (MS2), and ophthalmology resident (OR). Images of 188 eyes were graded for overall quality by two masked reviewers, and observed critical fundus findings were compared to dilated fundus examination documentation RESULTS: SO images were higher quality in the OR arm than in the MS1 and MS2 arms (P < .017). There were no differences in FC image quality between photographers (all P > .328). In the OR arm, SO images detected 74.3% of critical fundus findings, whereas FC images detected 77.1% CONCLUSION: SO produces fundus images approaching the quality and diagnostic utility of traditional FC photographs |
|---|---|
| Beschreibung: | Date Completed 22.02.2016 Date Revised 08.04.2022 published: Print Citation Status MEDLINE |
| ISSN: | 2325-8179 |
| DOI: | 10.3928/23258160-20150610-06 |