Assessing the impact of the U.S. Endangered Species Act recovery planning guidelines on managing threats for listed species

© 2015 Society for Conservation Biology.

Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology. - 1999. - 29(2015), 5 vom: 02. Okt., Seite 1423-33
1. Verfasser: Troyer, Caitlin M (VerfasserIn)
Weitere Verfasser: Gerber, Leah R
Format: Online-Aufsatz
Sprache:English
Veröffentlicht: 2015
Zugriff auf das übergeordnete Werk:Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology
Schlagworte:Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't Servicio de Pesca y Vida Silvestre de EUA U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service amenazas extinción extinction monitoreo monitoring pautas de planes de recuperación mehr... recovery plan guidelines threats
LEADER 01000naa a22002652 4500
001 NLM250287404
003 DE-627
005 20231224155416.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 231224s2015 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1111/cobi.12552  |2 doi 
028 5 2 |a pubmed24n0834.xml 
035 |a (DE-627)NLM250287404 
035 |a (NLM)26108948 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rakwb 
041 |a eng 
100 1 |a Troyer, Caitlin M  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Assessing the impact of the U.S. Endangered Species Act recovery planning guidelines on managing threats for listed species 
264 1 |c 2015 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a ƒaComputermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a ƒa Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
500 |a Date Completed 17.06.2016 
500 |a Date Revised 18.09.2015 
500 |a published: Print-Electronic 
500 |a Citation Status MEDLINE 
520 |a © 2015 Society for Conservation Biology. 
520 |a The Endangered Species Act (ESA) of the United States was enacted in 1973 to prevent the extinction of species. Recovery plans, required by 1988 amendments to the ESA, play an important role in organizing these efforts to protect and recover species. To improve the use of science in the recovery planning process, the Society for Conservation Biology (SCB) commissioned an independent review of endangered species recovery planning in 1999. From these findings, the SCB made key recommendations for how management agencies could improve the recovery planning process, after which the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and the National Marine Fisheries Service redrafted their recovery planning guidelines. One important recommendation called for recovery plans to make threats a primary focus, including organizing and prioritizing recovery tasks for threat abatement. We sought to determine the extent to which results from the SCB study were incorporated into these new guidelines and whether the SCB recommendations regarding threats manifested in recovery plans written under the new guidelines. Recovery planning guidelines generally incorporated the SCB recommendations, including those for managing threats. However, although recent recovery plans have improved in their treatment of threats, many fail to adequately incorporate threat monitoring. This failure suggests that developing clear guidelines for monitoring should be an important priority in improving ESA recovery planning 
650 4 |a Journal Article 
650 4 |a Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't 
650 4 |a Servicio de Pesca y Vida Silvestre de EUA 
650 4 |a U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service 
650 4 |a amenazas 
650 4 |a extinción 
650 4 |a extinction 
650 4 |a monitoreo 
650 4 |a monitoring 
650 4 |a pautas de planes de recuperación 
650 4 |a recovery plan guidelines 
650 4 |a threats 
700 1 |a Gerber, Leah R  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology  |d 1999  |g 29(2015), 5 vom: 02. Okt., Seite 1423-33  |w (DE-627)NLM098176803  |x 1523-1739  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:29  |g year:2015  |g number:5  |g day:02  |g month:10  |g pages:1423-33 
856 4 0 |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cobi.12552  |3 Volltext 
912 |a GBV_USEFLAG_A 
912 |a SYSFLAG_A 
912 |a GBV_NLM 
912 |a GBV_ILN_350 
951 |a AR 
952 |d 29  |j 2015  |e 5  |b 02  |c 10  |h 1423-33