MP2 calculation of (77) Se NMR chemical shifts taking into account relativistic corrections
Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Veröffentlicht in: | Magnetic resonance in chemistry : MRC. - 1985. - 53(2015), 7 vom: 01. Juli, Seite 485-92 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Weitere Verfasser: | , |
Format: | Online-Aufsatz |
Sprache: | English |
Veröffentlicht: |
2015
|
Zugriff auf das übergeordnete Werk: | Magnetic resonance in chemistry : MRC |
Schlagworte: | Journal Article 77Se NMR GIAO-MP2 chemical shift locally dense basis set magnetic shielding constant organoselenium compounds relativistic effects |
Zusammenfassung: | Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. The main factors affecting the accuracy and computational cost of the Second-order Möller-Plesset perturbation theory (MP2) calculation of (77) Se NMR chemical shifts (methods and basis sets, relativistic corrections, and solvent effects) are addressed with a special emphasis on relativistic effects. For the latter, paramagnetic contribution (390-466 ppm) dominates over diamagnetic term (192-198 ppm) resulting in a total shielding relativistic correction of about 230-260 ppm (some 15% of the total values of selenium absolute shielding constants). Diamagnetic term is practically constant, while paramagnetic contribution spans over 70-80 ppm. In the (77) Se NMR chemical shifts scale, relativistic corrections are about 20-30 ppm (some 5% of the total values of selenium chemical shifts). Solvent effects evaluated within the polarizable continuum solvation model are of the same order of magnitude as relativistic corrections (about 5%). For the practical calculations of (77) Se NMR chemical shifts of the medium-sized organoselenium compounds, the most efficient computational protocols employing relativistic Dyall's basis sets and taking into account relativistic and solvent corrections are suggested. The best result is characterized by a mean absolute error of 17 ppm for the span of (77) Se NMR chemical shifts reaching 2500 ppm resulting in a mean absolute percentage error of 0.7% |
---|---|
Beschreibung: | Date Completed 26.08.2015 Date Revised 24.06.2015 published: Print-Electronic Citation Status PubMed-not-MEDLINE |
ISSN: | 1097-458X |
DOI: | 10.1002/mrc.4226 |