Using community-level metrics to monitor the effects of marine protected areas on biodiversity

© 2015 Society for Conservation Biology.

Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology. - 1989. - 29(2015), 3 vom: 20. Juni, Seite 775-83
1. Verfasser: Soykan, Candan U (VerfasserIn)
Weitere Verfasser: Lewison, Rebecca L
Format: Online-Aufsatz
Sprache:English
Veröffentlicht: 2015
Zugriff auf das übergeordnete Werk:Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology
Schlagworte:Journal Article Meta-Analysis Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't AMP MPA abundance abundancia biomasa biomass diversidad de especies mehr... ecological indicator indicador ecológico monitoreo monitoring riqueza de especies species diversity species richness
LEADER 01000caa a22002652 4500
001 NLM245189408
003 DE-627
005 20250218004307.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 231224s2015 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1111/cobi.12445  |2 doi 
028 5 2 |a pubmed25n0817.xml 
035 |a (DE-627)NLM245189408 
035 |a (NLM)25572325 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rakwb 
041 |a eng 
100 1 |a Soykan, Candan U  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Using community-level metrics to monitor the effects of marine protected areas on biodiversity 
264 1 |c 2015 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a ƒaComputermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a ƒa Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
500 |a Date Completed 08.02.2016 
500 |a Date Revised 13.05.2015 
500 |a published: Print-Electronic 
500 |a Citation Status MEDLINE 
520 |a © 2015 Society for Conservation Biology. 
520 |a Marine protected areas (MPAs) are used to protect species, communities, and their associated habitats, among other goals. Measuring MPA efficacy can be challenging, however, particularly when considering responses at the community level. We gathered 36 abundance and 14 biomass data sets on fish assemblages and used meta-analysis to evaluate the ability of 22 distinct community diversity metrics to detect differences in community structure between MPAs and nearby control sites. We also considered the effects of 6 covariates-MPA size and age, MPA size and age interaction, latitude, total species richness, and level of protection-on each metric. Some common metrics, such as species richness and Shannon diversity, did not differ consistently between MPA and control sites, whereas other metrics, such as total abundance and biomass, were consistently different across studies. Metric responses derived from the biomass data sets were more consistent than those based on the abundance data sets, suggesting that community-level biomass differs more predictably than abundance between MPA and control sites. Covariate analyses indicated that level of protection, latitude, MPA size, and the interaction between MPA size and age affect metric performance. These results highlight a handful of metrics, several of which are little known, that could be used to meet the increasing demand for community-level indicators of MPA effectiveness 
650 4 |a Journal Article 
650 4 |a Meta-Analysis 
650 4 |a Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't 
650 4 |a AMP 
650 4 |a MPA 
650 4 |a abundance 
650 4 |a abundancia 
650 4 |a biomasa 
650 4 |a biomass 
650 4 |a diversidad de especies 
650 4 |a ecological indicator 
650 4 |a indicador ecológico 
650 4 |a monitoreo 
650 4 |a monitoring 
650 4 |a riqueza de especies 
650 4 |a species diversity 
650 4 |a species richness 
700 1 |a Lewison, Rebecca L  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology  |d 1989  |g 29(2015), 3 vom: 20. Juni, Seite 775-83  |w (DE-627)NLM098176803  |x 1523-1739  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:29  |g year:2015  |g number:3  |g day:20  |g month:06  |g pages:775-83 
856 4 0 |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cobi.12445  |3 Volltext 
912 |a GBV_USEFLAG_A 
912 |a SYSFLAG_A 
912 |a GBV_NLM 
912 |a GBV_ILN_350 
951 |a AR 
952 |d 29  |j 2015  |e 3  |b 20  |c 06  |h 775-83