Retrospective comparisons of vitrectomy with and without air tamponade to repair lamellar macular hole

Copyright 2015, SLACK Incorporated.

Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Ophthalmic surgery, lasers & imaging retina. - 2013. - 46(2015), 1 vom: 15. Jan., Seite 38-43
1. Verfasser: Sato, Tatsuhiko (VerfasserIn)
Weitere Verfasser: Emi, Kazuyuki, Bando, Hajime, Ikeda, Toshihide
Format: Online-Aufsatz
Sprache:English
Veröffentlicht: 2015
Zugriff auf das übergeordnete Werk:Ophthalmic surgery, lasers & imaging retina
Schlagworte:Comparative Study Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Copyright 2015, SLACK Incorporated.
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: To investigate the surgical outcomes of vitrectomy with to that without air tamponade in eyes with a lamellar macular hole
PATIENTS AND METHODS: The medical records of 23 eyes that underwent 25-gauge vitrectomy with air tamponade and 18 eyes that underwent 25-gauge vitrectomy alone were reviewed
RESULTS: The pre- and postoperative best corrected visual acuities (BCVAs) in logarithm of the minimum angle resolution units were 0.26 ± 0.27 and 0.12 ± 0.15 in eyes with tamponade and 0.35 ± 0.30 and 0.14 ± 0.23 in eyes without tamponade. There were no significant differences in BCVAs between the two groups both pre- and postoperatively. Postoperative BCVA was significantly improved in eyes with tamponade (P = .023) and without tamponade (P < .001). None of the cases developed a full-thickness macular hole postoperatively
CONCLUSION: These results suggest that air tamponade may not be required during vitrectomy to achieve good BCVA and anatomic closure in eyes with a lamellar macular hole
Beschreibung:Date Completed 18.06.2015
Date Revised 22.10.2015
published: Print
Citation Status MEDLINE
ISSN:2325-8179
DOI:10.3928/23258160-20150101-06