LEADER 01000naa a22002652 4500
001 NLM243227841
003 DE-627
005 20231224132059.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 231224s2015 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1111/cobi.12411  |2 doi 
028 5 2 |a pubmed24n0810.xml 
035 |a (DE-627)NLM243227841 
035 |a (NLM)25363833 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rakwb 
041 |a eng 
100 1 |a Milder, Jeffrey C  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
245 1 3 |a An agenda for assessing and improving conservation impacts of sustainability standards in tropical agriculture 
264 1 |c 2015 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a ƒaComputermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a ƒa Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
500 |a Date Completed 19.01.2016 
500 |a Date Revised 16.03.2015 
500 |a published: Print-Electronic 
500 |a Citation Status MEDLINE 
520 |a © 2014 Society for Conservation Biology. 
520 |a Sustainability standards and certification serve to differentiate and provide market recognition to goods produced in accordance with social and environmental good practices, typically including practices to protect biodiversity. Such standards have seen rapid growth, including in tropical agricultural commodities such as cocoa, coffee, palm oil, soybeans, and tea. Given the role of sustainability standards in influencing land use in hotspots of biodiversity, deforestation, and agricultural intensification, much could be gained from efforts to evaluate and increase the conservation payoff of these schemes. To this end, we devised a systematic approach for monitoring and evaluating the conservation impacts of agricultural sustainability standards and for using the resulting evidence to improve the effectiveness of such standards over time. The approach is oriented around a set of hypotheses and corresponding research questions about how sustainability standards are predicted to deliver conservation benefits. These questions are addressed through data from multiple sources, including basic common information from certification audits; field monitoring of environmental outcomes at a sample of certified sites; and rigorous impact assessment research based on experimental or quasi-experimental methods. Integration of these sources can generate time-series data that are comparable across sites and regions and provide detailed portraits of the effects of sustainability standards. To implement this approach, we propose new collaborations between the conservation research community and the sustainability standards community to develop common indicators and monitoring protocols, foster data sharing and synthesis, and link research and practice more effectively. As the role of sustainability standards in tropical land-use governance continues to evolve, robust evidence on the factors contributing to effectiveness can help to ensure that such standards are designed and implemented to maximize benefits for biodiversity conservation 
650 4 |a Journal Article 
650 4 |a biodiversidad 
650 4 |a biodiversity 
650 4 |a certificación 
650 4 |a certification 
650 4 |a conservación con base en evidencias 
650 4 |a evaluación 
650 4 |a evaluation 
650 4 |a evidence-based conservation 
650 4 |a monitoreo 
650 4 |a monitoring 
650 4 |a normas voluntarias de sostenibilidad 
650 4 |a voluntary sustainability standards 
700 1 |a Arbuthnot, Margaret  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Blackman, Allen  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Brooks, Sharon E  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Giovannucci, Daniele  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Gross, Lee  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Kennedy, Elizabeth T  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Komives, Kristin  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Lambin, Eric F  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Lee, Audrey  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Meyer, Daniel  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Newton, Peter  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Phalan, Ben  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Schroth, Götz  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Semroc, Bambi  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Van Rikxoort, Henk  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Zrust, Michal  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology  |d 1999  |g 29(2015), 2 vom: 21. Apr., Seite 309-20  |w (DE-627)NLM098176803  |x 1523-1739  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:29  |g year:2015  |g number:2  |g day:21  |g month:04  |g pages:309-20 
856 4 0 |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cobi.12411  |3 Volltext 
912 |a GBV_USEFLAG_A 
912 |a SYSFLAG_A 
912 |a GBV_NLM 
912 |a GBV_ILN_350 
951 |a AR 
952 |d 29  |j 2015  |e 2  |b 21  |c 04  |h 309-20