A protocol for eliciting nonmaterial values through a cultural ecosystem services frame

© 2014 The Authors. Conservation Biology published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of Society for Conservation Biology.

Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology. - 1989. - 29(2015), 2 vom: 15. Apr., Seite 575-86
1. Verfasser: Gould, Rachelle K (VerfasserIn)
Weitere Verfasser: Klain, Sarah C, Ardoin, Nicole M, Satterfield, Terre, Woodside, Ulalia, Hannahs, Neil, Daily, Gretchen C, Chan, Kai M
Format: Online-Aufsatz
Sprache:English
Veröffentlicht: 2015
Zugriff auf das übergeordnete Werk:Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology
Schlagworte:Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't British Columbia Columbia Británica Hawaii Hawái ciencia social deliberative decision making environmental management environmental values mehr... manejo ambiental sistemas socio-ecológicos social science social-ecological systems toma de decisiones deliberativas valores ambientales
LEADER 01000caa a22002652 4500
001 NLM243148615
003 DE-627
005 20250217163202.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 231224s2015 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1111/cobi.12407  |2 doi 
028 5 2 |a pubmed25n0810.xml 
035 |a (DE-627)NLM243148615 
035 |a (NLM)25354730 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rakwb 
041 |a eng 
100 1 |a Gould, Rachelle K  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
245 1 2 |a A protocol for eliciting nonmaterial values through a cultural ecosystem services frame 
264 1 |c 2015 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a ƒaComputermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a ƒa Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
500 |a Date Completed 19.01.2016 
500 |a Date Revised 21.10.2021 
500 |a published: Print-Electronic 
500 |a Citation Status MEDLINE 
520 |a © 2014 The Authors. Conservation Biology published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of Society for Conservation Biology. 
520 |a Stakeholders' nonmaterial desires, needs, and values often critically influence the success of conservation projects. These considerations are challenging to articulate and characterize, resulting in their limited uptake in management and policy. We devised an interview protocol designed to enhance understanding of cultural ecosystem services (CES). The protocol begins with discussion of ecosystem-related activities (e.g., recreation, hunting) and management and then addresses CES, prompting for values encompassing concepts identified in the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2005) and explored in other CES research. We piloted the protocol in Hawaii and British Columbia. In each location, we interviewed 30 individuals from diverse backgrounds. We analyzed results from the 2 locations to determine the effectiveness of the interview protocol in elucidating nonmaterial values. The qualitative and spatial components of the protocol helped characterize cultural, social, and ethical values associated with ecosystems in multiple ways. Maps and situational, or vignette-like, questions helped respondents articulate difficult-to-discuss values. Open-ended prompts allowed respondents to express a diversity of ecosystem-related values and proved sufficiently flexible for interviewees to communicate values for which the protocol did not explicitly probe. Finally, the results suggest that certain values, those mentioned frequently throughout the interview, are particularly salient for particular populations. The protocol can provide efficient, contextual, and place-based data on the importance of particular ecosystem attributes for human well-being. Qualitative data are complementary to quantitative and spatial assessments in the comprehensive representation of people's values pertaining to ecosystems, and this protocol may assist in incorporating values frequently overlooked in decision making processes 
650 4 |a Journal Article 
650 4 |a Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't 
650 4 |a British Columbia 
650 4 |a Columbia Británica 
650 4 |a Hawaii 
650 4 |a Hawái 
650 4 |a ciencia social 
650 4 |a deliberative decision making 
650 4 |a environmental management 
650 4 |a environmental values 
650 4 |a manejo ambiental 
650 4 |a sistemas socio-ecológicos 
650 4 |a social science 
650 4 |a social-ecological systems 
650 4 |a toma de decisiones deliberativas 
650 4 |a valores ambientales 
700 1 |a Klain, Sarah C  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Ardoin, Nicole M  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Satterfield, Terre  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Woodside, Ulalia  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Hannahs, Neil  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Daily, Gretchen C  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Chan, Kai M  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology  |d 1989  |g 29(2015), 2 vom: 15. Apr., Seite 575-86  |w (DE-627)NLM098176803  |x 1523-1739  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:29  |g year:2015  |g number:2  |g day:15  |g month:04  |g pages:575-86 
856 4 0 |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cobi.12407  |3 Volltext 
912 |a GBV_USEFLAG_A 
912 |a SYSFLAG_A 
912 |a GBV_NLM 
912 |a GBV_ILN_350 
951 |a AR 
952 |d 29  |j 2015  |e 2  |b 15  |c 04  |h 575-86