Avoiding re-inventing the wheel in a people-centered approach to REDD+

© 2014 Society for Conservation Biology.

Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology. - 1999. - 28(2014), 5 vom: 20. Okt., Seite 1380-93
1. Verfasser: Holmes, Ignacia (VerfasserIn)
Weitere Verfasser: Potvin, Catherine
Format: Online-Aufsatz
Sprache:English
Veröffentlicht: 2014
Zugriff auf das übergeordnete Werk:Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology
Schlagworte:Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't REDD+ implementation best practices carbono de bosque community-based conservation conservación conservación basada en la comunidad conservation desarrollo rural mehr... forest carbon implementación de REDD+ rural development
LEADER 01000naa a22002652 4500
001 NLM237647699
003 DE-627
005 20231224112115.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 231224s2014 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1111/cobi.12301  |2 doi 
028 5 2 |a pubmed24n0792.xml 
035 |a (DE-627)NLM237647699 
035 |a (NLM)24762062 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rakwb 
041 |a eng 
100 1 |a Holmes, Ignacia  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Avoiding re-inventing the wheel in a people-centered approach to REDD+ 
264 1 |c 2014 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a ƒaComputermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a ƒa Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
500 |a Date Completed 28.05.2015 
500 |a Date Revised 18.09.2014 
500 |a published: Print-Electronic 
500 |a Citation Status MEDLINE 
520 |a © 2014 Society for Conservation Biology. 
520 |a One important debate regarding Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation (REDD+) in developing countries concerns the manner in which its implementation might affect local and indigenous communities. New ways to implement this mechanism without harming the interests of local communities are emerging. To inform this debate, we conducted a qualitative research synthesis to identify best practices (BPs) from people-centered approaches to conservation and rural development, developed indicators of BPs, and invited development practitioners and researchers in the field to assess how the identified BPs are being adopted by community-level REDD+ projects in Latin America. BPs included: local participation in all phases of the project; project supported by a decentralized forest governance framework; project objectives matching community livelihood priorities; project addressing community development needs and expectations; project enhancing stakeholder collaboration and consensus building; project applying an adaptive management approach; and project developing national and local capacities. Most of the BPs were part of the evaluated projects. However, limitations of some of the projects related to decentralized forest governance, matching project objectives with community livelihood priorities, and addressing community development needs. Adaptive management and free and prior informed consent have been largely overlooked. These limitations could be addressed by integrating conservation outcomes and alternative livelihoods into longer-term community development goals, testing nested forest governance approaches in which national policies support local institutions for forest management, gaining a better understanding of the factors that will make REDD+ more acceptable to local communities, and applying an adaptive management approach that allows for social learning and capacity building of relevant stakeholders. Our study provides a framework of BPs and indicators that could be used by stakeholders to improve REDD+ project design, monitoring, and evaluation, which may help reconcile national initiatives and local interests without reinventing the wheel 
650 4 |a Journal Article 
650 4 |a Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't 
650 4 |a REDD+ implementation 
650 4 |a best practices 
650 4 |a carbono de bosque 
650 4 |a community-based conservation 
650 4 |a conservación 
650 4 |a conservación basada en la comunidad 
650 4 |a conservation 
650 4 |a desarrollo rural 
650 4 |a forest carbon 
650 4 |a implementación de REDD+ 
650 4 |a rural development 
700 1 |a Potvin, Catherine  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology  |d 1999  |g 28(2014), 5 vom: 20. Okt., Seite 1380-93  |w (DE-627)NLM098176803  |x 1523-1739  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:28  |g year:2014  |g number:5  |g day:20  |g month:10  |g pages:1380-93 
856 4 0 |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cobi.12301  |3 Volltext 
912 |a GBV_USEFLAG_A 
912 |a SYSFLAG_A 
912 |a GBV_NLM 
912 |a GBV_ILN_350 
951 |a AR 
952 |d 28  |j 2014  |e 5  |b 20  |c 10  |h 1380-93