Improving conservation outcomes with insights from local experts and bureaucracies

© 2014 Society for Conservation Biology.

Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology. - 1999. - 28(2014), 4 vom: 15. Aug., Seite 951-8
1. Verfasser: Haenn, Nora (VerfasserIn)
Weitere Verfasser: Schmook, Birgit, Reyes, Yol, Calmé, Sophie
Format: Online-Aufsatz
Sprache:English
Veröffentlicht: 2014
Zugriff auf das übergeordnete Werk:Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology
Schlagworte:Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't Autoridad ambiental King Vulture Latin America Latinoamérica Sarcoramphus papa borrar del conocimiento conocimiento ecológico local environmental governance mehr... erasure of knowledge ethnoecology etnoecología local ecological knowledge zopilote rey
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:© 2014 Society for Conservation Biology.
We describe conservation built on local expertise such that it constitutes a hybrid form of traditional and bureaucratic knowledge. Researchers regularly ask how local knowledge might be applied to programs linked to protected areas. By examining the production of conservation knowledge in southern Mexico, we assert local expertise is already central to conservation. However, bureaucratic norms and social identity differences between lay experts and conservation practitioners prevent the public valuing of traditional knowledge. We make this point by contrasting 2 examples. The first is a master's thesis survey of local experts regarding the biology of the King Vulture (Sarcoramphus papa) in which data collection took place in communities adjacent to the Calakmul Biosphere Reserve. The second is a workshop sponsored by the same reserve that instructed farmers on how to monitor endangered species, including the King Vulture. In both examples, conservation knowledge would not have existed without traditional knowledge. In both examples, this traditional knowledge is absent from scientific reporting. On the basis of these findings, we suggest conservation outcomes may be improved by recognizing the knowledge contributions local experts already make to conservation programming
Beschreibung:Date Completed 25.08.2015
Date Revised 23.07.2014
published: Print-Electronic
Citation Status MEDLINE
ISSN:1523-1739
DOI:10.1111/cobi.12265