|
|
|
|
LEADER |
01000naa a22002652 4500 |
001 |
NLM235895709 |
003 |
DE-627 |
005 |
20231224104400.0 |
007 |
cr uuu---uuuuu |
008 |
231224s2014 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c |
024 |
7 |
|
|a 10.1093/jxb/ert487
|2 doi
|
028 |
5 |
2 |
|a pubmed24n0786.xml
|
035 |
|
|
|a (DE-627)NLM235895709
|
035 |
|
|
|a (NLM)24574484
|
040 |
|
|
|a DE-627
|b ger
|c DE-627
|e rakwb
|
041 |
|
|
|a eng
|
100 |
1 |
|
|a Thines, Bryan C
|e verfasserin
|4 aut
|
245 |
1 |
4 |
|a The time of day effects of warm temperature on flowering time involve PIF4 and PIF5
|
264 |
|
1 |
|c 2014
|
336 |
|
|
|a Text
|b txt
|2 rdacontent
|
337 |
|
|
|a ƒaComputermedien
|b c
|2 rdamedia
|
338 |
|
|
|a ƒa Online-Ressource
|b cr
|2 rdacarrier
|
500 |
|
|
|a Date Completed 04.11.2014
|
500 |
|
|
|a Date Revised 21.10.2021
|
500 |
|
|
|a published: Print
|
500 |
|
|
|a Citation Status MEDLINE
|
520 |
|
|
|a Warm temperature promotes flowering in Arabidopsis thaliana and this response involves multiple signalling pathways. To understand the temporal dynamics of temperature perception, tests were carried out to determine if there was a daily window of enhanced sensitivity to warm temperature (28 °C). Warm temperature applied during daytime, night-time, or continuously elicited earlier flowering, but the effects of each treatment were unequal. Plants exposed to warm night (WN) conditions flowered nearly as early as those in constant warm (CW) conditions, while treatment with warm days (WD) caused later flowering than either WN or CW. Flowering in each condition relied to varying degrees on the activity of CO , FT , PIF4 , and PIF5 , as well as the action of unknown genes. The combination of signalling pathways involved in flowering depended on the time of the temperature cue. WN treatments caused a significant advance in the rhythmic expression waveform of CO, which correlated with pronounced up-regulation of FT expression, while WD caused limited changes in CO expression and no stimulation of FT expression. WN- and WD-induced flowering was partially CO independent and, unexpectedly, dependent on PIF4 and PIF5 . pif4-2, pif5-3, and pif4-2 pif5-3 mutants had delayed flowering under all three warm conditions. The double mutant was also late flowering in control conditions. In addition, WN conditions alone imposed selective changes to PIF4 and PIF5 expression. Thus, the PIF4 and PIF5 transcription factors promote flowering by at least two means: inducing FT expression in WN and acting outside of FT by an unknown mechanism in WD
|
650 |
|
4 |
|a Journal Article
|
650 |
|
4 |
|a Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
|
650 |
|
4 |
|a Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.
|
650 |
|
4 |
|a CONSTANS
|
650 |
|
4 |
|a Circadian clock
|
650 |
|
4 |
|a FLOWERING LOCUS T
|
650 |
|
4 |
|a PHYTOCHROME INTERACTING FACTOR
|
650 |
|
4 |
|a PIF4
|
650 |
|
4 |
|a PIF5
|
650 |
|
4 |
|a flowering
|
650 |
|
4 |
|a temperature response.
|
650 |
|
7 |
|a Arabidopsis Proteins
|2 NLM
|
650 |
|
7 |
|a Basic Helix-Loop-Helix Transcription Factors
|2 NLM
|
650 |
|
7 |
|a CONSTANS protein, Arabidopsis
|2 NLM
|
650 |
|
7 |
|a DNA-Binding Proteins
|2 NLM
|
650 |
|
7 |
|a FT protein, Arabidopsis
|2 NLM
|
650 |
|
7 |
|a PIF4 protein, Arabidopsis
|2 NLM
|
650 |
|
7 |
|a PIF5 protein, Arabidopsis
|2 NLM
|
650 |
|
7 |
|a Transcription Factors
|2 NLM
|
700 |
1 |
|
|a Youn, Youngwon
|e verfasserin
|4 aut
|
700 |
1 |
|
|a Duarte, Maritza I
|e verfasserin
|4 aut
|
700 |
1 |
|
|a Harmon, Frank G
|e verfasserin
|4 aut
|
773 |
0 |
8 |
|i Enthalten in
|t Journal of experimental botany
|d 1985
|g 65(2014), 4 vom: 26. März, Seite 1141-51
|w (DE-627)NLM098182706
|x 1460-2431
|7 nnns
|
773 |
1 |
8 |
|g volume:65
|g year:2014
|g number:4
|g day:26
|g month:03
|g pages:1141-51
|
856 |
4 |
0 |
|u http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jxb/ert487
|3 Volltext
|
912 |
|
|
|a GBV_USEFLAG_A
|
912 |
|
|
|a SYSFLAG_A
|
912 |
|
|
|a GBV_NLM
|
912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_350
|
951 |
|
|
|a AR
|
952 |
|
|
|d 65
|j 2014
|e 4
|b 26
|c 03
|h 1141-51
|