Assimilative branches and leaves of the desert plant Alhagi sparsifolia Shap. possesses a different adaptation mechanism to shade

Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.

Détails bibliographiques
Publié dans:Plant physiology and biochemistry : PPB. - 1991. - 74(2014) vom: 05. Jan., Seite 239-45
Auteur principal: Lei, Li (Auteur)
Autres auteurs: Xiang-yi, Li, Xin-wen, Xu, Li-sha, Lin, Fan-jiang, Zeng, Feng-li, Chen
Format: Article en ligne
Langue:English
Publié: 2014
Accès à la collection:Plant physiology and biochemistry : PPB
Sujets:Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't Alhagi sparsifolia Shap. Biomass allocation Chl Chlorophyll a fluorescence Leaves and assimilative branches Light adaptation PAR PEA plus... PSII Q(A) Q(B) RC SAA SAL SLA chlorophyll photosynthetic active radiation photosystem II plant efficiency analyzer primary quinine electron acceptors of PSII reaction center second quinine electron acceptors of PSII specific assimilative branch area specific assimilative branch length specific leaf area
Description
Résumé:Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.
Leaves and assimilative branches are crucial to the life cycle of Alhagi sparsifolia Shap. (Fabaceae), which grows in high-irradiance environments and is the main vegetation in the forelands of the Taklamakan Desert. This plant has an important role in wind protection and sand fixation at the oasis-desert transition zone. The morphology, physiology, and photosynthesis of A. sparsifolia leaves growing under low-light conditions have been extensively investigated. However, whether the plant's assimilative branches adapt similarly to low light levels is unclear, as are its specific light adaptation mechanisms. In this report, we characterized the biomass allocation, morphology, and chlorophyll a fluorescence of leaves and assimilative branches of A. sparsifolia. The results indicated that low-light conditions limited the normal growth of A. sparsifolia. The fraction of biomass allocated to leaves increased, whereas that to assimilative branches decreased. In addition, leaf thickness and assimilative branch diameter decreased, resulting in higher specific leaf area, specific assimilative branch length, and area for higher light absorbing and higher efficiency of light-usage. The assimilative branches and leaves were responded oppositely under low-light conditions in that leaves had lower photosystem II activity and assimilative branches had higher light-use efficiency to maximize light energy absorption for growth of A. sparsifolia
Description:Date Completed 22.09.2014
Date Revised 30.09.2020
published: Print-Electronic
Citation Status MEDLINE
ISSN:1873-2690
DOI:10.1016/j.plaphy.2013.11.009