Environmental burdens in the management of end-of-life cathode ray tubes

Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Waste management (New York, N.Y.). - 1999. - 34(2014), 2 vom: 01. Feb., Seite 468-74
1. Verfasser: Rocchetti, Laura (VerfasserIn)
Weitere Verfasser: Beolchini, Francesca
Format: Online-Aufsatz
Sprache:English
Veröffentlicht: 2014
Zugriff auf das übergeordnete Werk:Waste management (New York, N.Y.)
Schlagworte:Journal Article End-of-life CRT Environmental impacts Life-cycle assessment Recycling Yttrium Powders 58784XQC3Y
LEADER 01000caa a22002652c 4500
001 NLM232714274
003 DE-627
005 20250216063821.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 231224s2014 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1016/j.wasman.2013.10.031  |2 doi 
028 5 2 |a pubmed25n0775.xml 
035 |a (DE-627)NLM232714274 
035 |a (NLM)24238800 
035 |a (PII)S0956-053X(13)00517-5 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rakwb 
041 |a eng 
100 1 |a Rocchetti, Laura  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Environmental burdens in the management of end-of-life cathode ray tubes 
264 1 |c 2014 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a ƒaComputermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a ƒa Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
500 |a Date Completed 15.09.2014 
500 |a Date Revised 20.01.2014 
500 |a published: Print-Electronic 
500 |a Citation Status MEDLINE 
520 |a Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. 
520 |a We compared the environmental burdens in the management of end-of life cathode ray tubes (CRTs) within two frameworks according to the different technologies of the production of televisions/monitors. In the first case, CRT recycling is addressed to the recovery of the panel and funnel glass for the manufacturing of new CRT screens. In the second case, where flat screen technology has replaced that of CRT, the recycling is addressed to the recovery of the glass cullet and lead for other applications. The impacts were evaluated according to the problem-oriented methodology of the Institute of Environmental Sciences, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands. Our data confirm that in both cases, the recycling treatment allows benefits to be gained for the environment through the recovery of the secondary raw materials. These benefits are higher for the "CRT technology" framework (1 kg CO2 saved per CRT) than for the "flat screen technology" (0.9 kg CO2 saved, per CRT, as the highest possible), mainly due to the high energy consumption for lead separation from the funnel glass. Furthermore, the recovery of yttrium from the fluorescent powders that are a residue of the recycling treatment would further improve the CO2 credit for both the frameworks considered, which would provide a further saving of about 0.75 kg CO2 per CRT, net of the energy and raw materials needed for the recovery. Overall, this study confirms that, even with a change in the destination of the recovered materials, the recycling processes provide a benefit for the environment: indeed the higher loads for the environment are balanced by avoiding the primary production of the recovered materials 
650 4 |a Journal Article 
650 4 |a End-of-life CRT 
650 4 |a Environmental impacts 
650 4 |a Life-cycle assessment 
650 4 |a Recycling 
650 4 |a Yttrium 
650 7 |a Powders  |2 NLM 
650 7 |a Yttrium  |2 NLM 
650 7 |a 58784XQC3Y  |2 NLM 
700 1 |a Beolchini, Francesca  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Waste management (New York, N.Y.)  |d 1999  |g 34(2014), 2 vom: 01. Feb., Seite 468-74  |w (DE-627)NLM098197061  |x 1879-2456  |7 nnas 
773 1 8 |g volume:34  |g year:2014  |g number:2  |g day:01  |g month:02  |g pages:468-74 
856 4 0 |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2013.10.031  |3 Volltext 
912 |a GBV_USEFLAG_A 
912 |a SYSFLAG_A 
912 |a GBV_NLM 
912 |a GBV_ILN_350 
951 |a AR 
952 |d 34  |j 2014  |e 2  |b 01  |c 02  |h 468-74