|
|
|
|
| LEADER |
01000naa a22002652 4500 |
| 001 |
NLM232146462 |
| 003 |
DE-627 |
| 005 |
20231224092338.0 |
| 007 |
cr uuu---uuuuu |
| 008 |
231224s2013 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c |
| 024 |
7 |
|
|a 10.1016/j.jsha.2013.03.001
|2 doi
|
| 028 |
5 |
2 |
|a pubmed24n0773.xml
|
| 035 |
|
|
|a (DE-627)NLM232146462
|
| 035 |
|
|
|a (NLM)24174850
|
| 040 |
|
|
|a DE-627
|b ger
|c DE-627
|e rakwb
|
| 041 |
|
|
|a eng
|
| 100 |
1 |
|
|a Lee, Michael S
|e verfasserin
|4 aut
|
| 245 |
1 |
0 |
|a Comparison of sirolimus-, paclitaxel-, and everolimus-eluting stent in unprotected left main coronary artery percutaneous coronary intervention
|
| 264 |
|
1 |
|c 2013
|
| 336 |
|
|
|a Text
|b txt
|2 rdacontent
|
| 337 |
|
|
|a ƒaComputermedien
|b c
|2 rdamedia
|
| 338 |
|
|
|a ƒa Online-Ressource
|b cr
|2 rdacarrier
|
| 500 |
|
|
|a Date Completed 31.10.2013
|
| 500 |
|
|
|a Date Revised 21.10.2021
|
| 500 |
|
|
|a published: Print-Electronic
|
| 500 |
|
|
|a Citation Status PubMed-not-MEDLINE
|
| 520 |
|
|
|a OBJECTIVES: This retrospective study evaluated the outcomes of patients who underwent unprotected left main coronary artery (ULMCA) percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with different types of drug-eluting stents (DES)
|
| 520 |
|
|
|a BACKGROUND: The standard of care for patients with ULMCA is coronary artery bypass surgery. However, current guidelines recommend PCI in clinical conditions where there is an increased risk of adverse surgical outcomes. Clinical outcomes of patients undergoing ULMCA PCI with different types of drug-eluting stents (DES) are unknown
|
| 520 |
|
|
|a METHODS: Data from a multicenter international registry, which included 239 consecutive patients from four institutions who ULMCA PCI with DES, were collected
|
| 520 |
|
|
|a RESULTS: There were 42 patients receiving paclitaxel-eluting stent (PES), 158 patients receiving sirolimus-eluting stent (SES), and 39 patients receiving everolimus-eluting stent (EES). There was no statistical difference in major adverse cardiovascular events, cardiac death, myocardial infarction, target lesion revascularization, and stent thrombosis among PES, SES, and EES at 30 days and 1 year
|
| 520 |
|
|
|a CONCLUSIONS: There are no differences in clinical events among patients receiving PES, SES, and EES for ULMCA disease
|
| 650 |
|
4 |
|a Journal Article
|
| 650 |
|
4 |
|a Drug-eluting stent
|
| 650 |
|
4 |
|a Left main disease
|
| 650 |
|
4 |
|a Percutaneous coronary intervention
|
| 700 |
1 |
|
|a Mahmud, Ehtisham
|e verfasserin
|4 aut
|
| 700 |
1 |
|
|a Ang, Lawrence
|e verfasserin
|4 aut
|
| 700 |
1 |
|
|a Lluri, Gentian
|e verfasserin
|4 aut
|
| 700 |
1 |
|
|a Cheng, Richard K
|e verfasserin
|4 aut
|
| 700 |
1 |
|
|a Aragon, Joseph
|e verfasserin
|4 aut
|
| 700 |
1 |
|
|a Sheiban, Imad
|e verfasserin
|4 aut
|
| 773 |
0 |
8 |
|i Enthalten in
|t Journal of the Saudi Heart Association
|d 1999
|g 25(2013), 2 vom: 03. Apr., Seite 75-8
|w (DE-627)NLM098225227
|x 1016-7315
|7 nnns
|
| 773 |
1 |
8 |
|g volume:25
|g year:2013
|g number:2
|g day:03
|g month:04
|g pages:75-8
|
| 856 |
4 |
0 |
|u http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jsha.2013.03.001
|3 Volltext
|
| 912 |
|
|
|a GBV_USEFLAG_A
|
| 912 |
|
|
|a SYSFLAG_A
|
| 912 |
|
|
|a GBV_NLM
|
| 912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_350
|
| 951 |
|
|
|a AR
|
| 952 |
|
|
|d 25
|j 2013
|e 2
|b 03
|c 04
|h 75-8
|