Resting heart rate in patients with ischemic heart disease in Saudi Arabia and Egypt

AIM: To assess the level of resting heart rate (RHR) in an outpatient population presenting with stable coronary artery disease (CAD) as well as to measure its association with current therapeutic management strategies for cardiovascular events

Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of the Saudi Heart Association. - 1999. - 23(2011), 4 vom: 20. Okt., Seite 225-32
1. Verfasser: Kinsara, Abdulhalim J (VerfasserIn)
Weitere Verfasser: Najm, Hani K, Anazi, Menwar Al, Tamim, Hani
Format: Online-Aufsatz
Sprache:English
Veröffentlicht: 2011
Zugriff auf das übergeordnete Werk:Journal of the Saudi Heart Association
Schlagworte:Journal Article CAD, coronary artery disease Egypt HF, heart failure NYHA, New York Heart Association Classification Outcome RHR, resting heart rate Resting heart rate Saudi Arabia
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:AIM: To assess the level of resting heart rate (RHR) in an outpatient population presenting with stable coronary artery disease (CAD) as well as to measure its association with current therapeutic management strategies for cardiovascular events
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A multi-center cross-sectional survey was carried out in Saudi Arabia and Egypt over a three month period (between January 2007 and April 2007). 2049 patients with CAD without clinical heart failure (HF) were included in this study through "cluster sampling". RHR was measured by manual palpitation
RESULTS: Mean age of CAD patients was 56.7 ± 10.4 and the mean RHR was 78.9 ± 13.9 b/m. 1686 patients (83.1%) were on β-blockers for whom the RHR was 78.5 ± 14.0 b/m (95.5% had RHR ⩾ 60 b/m, which is higher than recommended by the guidelines). 1094 (73.5%) of patients on β-blockers were on a lower dose, probably to avoid the complications associated with such a class. Among those not on β-blockers (16.9%), RHR was 80.9 ± 13.0 b/m. Moreover, 98 patients (4.8%) were on calcium channel blocker (diltiazem or verapamil) but not on β-blockers, for whom the RHR was 80.9 ± 12.0 b/m. Finally, 163 patients (8.0%) were on both β-blockers and the calcium channel blocker, and their RHR was 79.0 ± 14.4 b/m
CONCLUSION: Optimal target RHR has not been achieved in a significant number of screened patients. Achievements of such targets are known to decrease mortality and to improve survival
Beschreibung:Date Completed 20.08.2013
Date Revised 21.10.2021
published: Print-Electronic
Citation Status PubMed-not-MEDLINE
ISSN:1016-7315
DOI:10.1016/j.jsha.2011.05.001