A protocol for better design, application, and communication of population viability analyses

© 2013 Society for Conservation Biology.

Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology. - 1999. - 27(2013), 4 vom: 18. Aug., Seite 644-56
1. Verfasser: Pe'er, Guy (VerfasserIn)
Weitere Verfasser: Matsinos, Yiannis G, Johst, Karin, Franz, Kamila W, Turlure, Camille, Radchuk, Viktoriia, Malinowska, Agnieszka H, Curtis, Janelle M R, Naujokaitis-Lewis, Ilona, Wintle, Brendan A, Henle, Klaus
Format: Online-Aufsatz
Sprache:English
Veröffentlicht: 2013
Zugriff auf das übergeordnete Werk:Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology
Schlagworte:Journal Article ciencia de la comunicación documentación del modelo ecological modeling evaluación de riesgo meta análisis meta-analysis model documentation modelación ecológica reportaje estandarizado mehr... risk assessment science communication standardized reporting
LEADER 01000naa a22002652 4500
001 NLM227670752
003 DE-627
005 20231224074221.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 231224s2013 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1111/cobi.12076  |2 doi 
028 5 2 |a pubmed24n0759.xml 
035 |a (DE-627)NLM227670752 
035 |a (NLM)23692056 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rakwb 
041 |a eng 
100 1 |a Pe'er, Guy  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
245 1 2 |a A protocol for better design, application, and communication of population viability analyses 
264 1 |c 2013 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a ƒaComputermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a ƒa Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
500 |a Date Completed 10.02.2014 
500 |a Date Revised 09.02.2021 
500 |a published: Print-Electronic 
500 |a Citation Status MEDLINE 
520 |a © 2013 Society for Conservation Biology. 
520 |a Population viability analyses (PVAs) contribute to conservation theory, policy, and management. Most PVAs focus on single species within a given landscape and address a specific problem. This specificity often is reflected in the organization of published PVA descriptions. Many lack structure, making them difficult to understand, assess, repeat, or use for drawing generalizations across PVA studies. In an assessment comparing published PVAs and existing guidelines, we found that model selection was rarely justified; important parameters remained neglected or their implementation was described vaguely; limited details were given on parameter ranges, sensitivity analysis, and scenarios; and results were often reported too inconsistently to enable repeatability and comparability. Although many guidelines exist on how to design and implement reliable PVAs and standards exist for documenting and communicating ecological models in general, there is a lack of organized guidelines for designing, applying, and communicating PVAs that account for their diversity of structures and contents. To fill this gap, we integrated published guidelines and recommendations for PVA design and application, protocols for documenting ecological models in general and individual-based models in particular, and our collective experience in developing, applying, and reviewing PVAs. We devised a comprehensive protocol for the design, application, and communication of PVAs (DAC-PVA), which has 3 primary elements. The first defines what a useful PVA is; the second element provides a workflow for the design and application of a useful PVA and highlights important aspects that need to be considered during these processes; and the third element focuses on communication of PVAs to ensure clarity, comprehensiveness, repeatability, and comparability. Thereby, DAC-PVA should strengthen the credibility and relevance of PVAs for policy and management, and improve the capacity to generalize PVA findings across studies 
650 4 |a Journal Article 
650 4 |a ciencia de la comunicación 
650 4 |a documentación del modelo 
650 4 |a ecological modeling 
650 4 |a evaluación de riesgo 
650 4 |a meta análisis 
650 4 |a meta-analysis 
650 4 |a model documentation 
650 4 |a modelación ecológica 
650 4 |a reportaje estandarizado 
650 4 |a risk assessment 
650 4 |a science communication 
650 4 |a standardized reporting 
700 1 |a Matsinos, Yiannis G  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Johst, Karin  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Franz, Kamila W  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Turlure, Camille  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Radchuk, Viktoriia  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Malinowska, Agnieszka H  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Curtis, Janelle M R  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Naujokaitis-Lewis, Ilona  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Wintle, Brendan A  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Henle, Klaus  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology  |d 1999  |g 27(2013), 4 vom: 18. Aug., Seite 644-56  |w (DE-627)NLM098176803  |x 1523-1739  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:27  |g year:2013  |g number:4  |g day:18  |g month:08  |g pages:644-56 
856 4 0 |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cobi.12076  |3 Volltext 
912 |a GBV_USEFLAG_A 
912 |a SYSFLAG_A 
912 |a GBV_NLM 
912 |a GBV_ILN_350 
951 |a AR 
952 |d 27  |j 2013  |e 4  |b 18  |c 08  |h 644-56