Statistical analysis of optimum Fenton oxidation conditions for landfill leachate treatment

Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Waste management (New York, N.Y.). - 1999. - 33(2013), 1 vom: 14. Jan., Seite 81-8
1. Verfasser: Singh, Shrawan K (VerfasserIn)
Weitere Verfasser: Tang, Walter Z
Format: Online-Aufsatz
Sprache:English
Veröffentlicht: 2013
Zugriff auf das übergeordnete Werk:Waste management (New York, N.Y.)
Schlagworte:Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't Review Fenton's reagent Organic Chemicals Water Pollutants, Chemical Hydrogen Peroxide BBX060AN9V Iron E1UOL152H7
LEADER 01000naa a22002652 4500
001 NLM22104907X
003 DE-627
005 20231224050907.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 231224s2013 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1016/j.wasman.2012.08.005  |2 doi 
028 5 2 |a pubmed24n0736.xml 
035 |a (DE-627)NLM22104907X 
035 |a (NLM)22980910 
035 |a (PII)S0956-053X(12)00371-6 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rakwb 
041 |a eng 
100 1 |a Singh, Shrawan K  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Statistical analysis of optimum Fenton oxidation conditions for landfill leachate treatment 
264 1 |c 2013 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a ƒaComputermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a ƒa Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
500 |a Date Completed 21.05.2013 
500 |a Date Revised 21.11.2013 
500 |a published: Print-Electronic 
500 |a Citation Status MEDLINE 
520 |a Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. 
520 |a Optimal operating conditions observed by peer reviewed publications for Fenton oxidation of raw and biological and coagulation treated leachates were reviewed and statistically analyzed. For the first-stage Fenton oxidation, the optimal pH range of 2.5-4.5 was observed for raw and coagulation treated leachates with a median pH of 3.0, whereas, for biologically treated leachate the optimum pH range was 2.5-6.0 with a median pH of 4.2. Theoretically, the optimal ratio of H(2)O(2)/Fe(2+) should be the ratio of rate constants of the reactions between OH() radical with Fe(2+) and H(2)O(2), which is approximately 11; however, for leachate treatment, a median optimum relative dose of 1.8 (w/w) (3.0M/M) was observed. Biologically treated leachate showed relatively lower optimum ratio of H(2)O(2)/Fe(2+) doses (median: 0.9 w/w) as compared to raw (median: 2.4 w/w) and coagulation treated (median: 2.8 w/w) leachate. Median absolute doses of H(2)O(2) and Fe(2+) were 1.2mg H(2)O(2)/mg of initial COD (COD(0)) and 0.9 mg Fe(2+)/mg COD(0), respectively and raw leachate required higher reagent doses compared to pretreated leachates. A universal Fenton oxidation relationship between COD removal efficiency (η) and COD loading factor (L(COD)) for landfill leachate treatment was developed. As L(COD) increases from 0.03 to 72.0, η varies linearly as η=0.733 L(COD)-0.182. This robust linear relationship between L(COD) and η holds for Fenton oxidation of raw as well as biological and coagulation treated leachates. The relationship was validated using Leave-one-out cross validation technique and errors in predicting η using L(COD) were evaluated by applying Monte Carlo Simulation. As a result, the relationship can be used as a universal equation to predict Fenton treatment efficiency for a given COD(0) loading in the range of 0.03-72.0 for landfill leachate treatment 
650 4 |a Journal Article 
650 4 |a Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't 
650 4 |a Review 
650 7 |a Fenton's reagent  |2 NLM 
650 7 |a Organic Chemicals  |2 NLM 
650 7 |a Water Pollutants, Chemical  |2 NLM 
650 7 |a Hydrogen Peroxide  |2 NLM 
650 7 |a BBX060AN9V  |2 NLM 
650 7 |a Iron  |2 NLM 
650 7 |a E1UOL152H7  |2 NLM 
700 1 |a Tang, Walter Z  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Waste management (New York, N.Y.)  |d 1999  |g 33(2013), 1 vom: 14. Jan., Seite 81-8  |w (DE-627)NLM098197061  |x 1879-2456  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:33  |g year:2013  |g number:1  |g day:14  |g month:01  |g pages:81-8 
856 4 0 |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2012.08.005  |3 Volltext 
912 |a GBV_USEFLAG_A 
912 |a SYSFLAG_A 
912 |a GBV_NLM 
912 |a GBV_ILN_350 
951 |a AR 
952 |d 33  |j 2013  |e 1  |b 14  |c 01  |h 81-8