|
|
|
|
LEADER |
01000caa a22002652c 4500 |
001 |
NLM219926417 |
003 |
DE-627 |
005 |
20250214071512.0 |
007 |
tu |
008 |
231224s2012 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c |
028 |
5 |
2 |
|a pubmed25n0733.xml
|
035 |
|
|
|a (DE-627)NLM219926417
|
035 |
|
|
|a (NLM)22856320
|
040 |
|
|
|a DE-627
|b ger
|c DE-627
|e rakwb
|
041 |
|
|
|a eng
|
100 |
1 |
|
|a Mohapatra, D P
|e verfasserin
|4 aut
|
245 |
1 |
0 |
|a Sewage treatment in integrated system of UASB reactor and duckweed pond and reuse for aquaculture
|
264 |
|
1 |
|c 2012
|
336 |
|
|
|a Text
|b txt
|2 rdacontent
|
337 |
|
|
|a ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen
|b n
|2 rdamedia
|
338 |
|
|
|a Band
|b nc
|2 rdacarrier
|
500 |
|
|
|a Date Completed 06.09.2012
|
500 |
|
|
|a Date Revised 10.12.2019
|
500 |
|
|
|a published: Print
|
500 |
|
|
|a Citation Status MEDLINE
|
520 |
|
|
|a The performance of a laboratory-scale upflow anaerobic sludge blanket (UASB) reactor and a duckweed pond containing Lemna gibba was investigated for suitability for treating effluent for use in aquaculture. While treating low-strength sewage having a chemical oxygen demand (COD) of typically less than 200 mg/L, with an increase in hydraulic retention time (HRT) from 10.04 to 33.49 h, COD removal efficiency of the UASB reactor decreased owing to a decrease in organic loading rate (OLR) causing poor mixing in the reactor. However, even at the lower OLR (0.475 kg COD/(m3 x d)), the UASB reactor gave a removal efficiency of 68% for COD and 74% for biochemical oxygen demand (BOD). The maximum COD, BOD, ammonia-nitrogen and phosphate removal efficiencies of the duckweed pond were 40.77%, 38.01%, 61.87% and 88.57%, respectively. Decreasing the OLR by increasing the HRT resulted in an increase in efficiency of the duckweed pond for removal of ammonia-nitrogen and phosphate. The OLR of 0.005 kg COD/(m2 x d) and HRT of 108 h in the duckweed pond satisfied aquaculture quality requirements. A specific growth rate of 0.23% was observed for tilapia fish fed with duckweed harvested from the duckweed pond. The economic analysis proved that it was beneficial to use the integrated system of a UASB reactor and a duckweed pond for treatment of sewage
|
650 |
|
4 |
|a Evaluation Study
|
650 |
|
4 |
|a Journal Article
|
650 |
|
4 |
|a Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
|
650 |
|
7 |
|a Biofuels
|2 NLM
|
650 |
|
7 |
|a Sewage
|2 NLM
|
650 |
|
7 |
|a Water
|2 NLM
|
650 |
|
7 |
|a 059QF0KO0R
|2 NLM
|
650 |
|
7 |
|a Methane
|2 NLM
|
650 |
|
7 |
|a OP0UW79H66
|2 NLM
|
700 |
1 |
|
|a Ghangrekar, M M
|e verfasserin
|4 aut
|
700 |
1 |
|
|a Mitra, A
|e verfasserin
|4 aut
|
700 |
1 |
|
|a Brar, S K
|e verfasserin
|4 aut
|
773 |
0 |
8 |
|i Enthalten in
|t Environmental technology
|d 1993
|g 33(2012), 10-12 vom: 16. Juni, Seite 1445-53
|w (DE-627)NLM098202545
|x 1479-487X
|7 nnas
|
773 |
1 |
8 |
|g volume:33
|g year:2012
|g number:10-12
|g day:16
|g month:06
|g pages:1445-53
|
912 |
|
|
|a GBV_USEFLAG_A
|
912 |
|
|
|a SYSFLAG_A
|
912 |
|
|
|a GBV_NLM
|
912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_350
|
951 |
|
|
|a AR
|
952 |
|
|
|d 33
|j 2012
|e 10-12
|b 16
|c 06
|h 1445-53
|