Comparison between a moving bed bioreactor and a fixed bed bioreactor for biological phosphate removal and denitrification

Moving bed bioreactors (MBBR) and fixed bed bioreactors (FBBR) were compared for biological phosphorus removal and denitrification. The sorption denitrification P-elimination (S-DN-P) process was selected for this study. Results indicated that all nutrients were removed by the FBBR process compared...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research. - 1986. - 65(2012), 10 vom: 10., Seite 1834-8
1. Verfasser: Choi, H J (VerfasserIn)
Weitere Verfasser: Lee, A H, Lee, S M
Format: Online-Aufsatz
Sprache:English
Veröffentlicht: 2012
Zugriff auf das übergeordnete Werk:Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research
Schlagworte:Comparative Study Journal Article Nitrates Phosphates Sewage Water Pollutants, Chemical Oxygen S88TT14065
LEADER 01000caa a22002652c 4500
001 NLM217417639
003 DE-627
005 20250213224725.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 231224s2012 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.2166/wst.2012.847  |2 doi 
028 5 2 |a pubmed25n0724.xml 
035 |a (DE-627)NLM217417639 
035 |a (NLM)22546799 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rakwb 
041 |a eng 
100 1 |a Choi, H J  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Comparison between a moving bed bioreactor and a fixed bed bioreactor for biological phosphate removal and denitrification 
264 1 |c 2012 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a ƒaComputermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a ƒa Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
500 |a Date Completed 17.07.2012 
500 |a Date Revised 21.11.2013 
500 |a published: Print 
500 |a Citation Status MEDLINE 
520 |a Moving bed bioreactors (MBBR) and fixed bed bioreactors (FBBR) were compared for biological phosphorus removal and denitrification. The sorption denitrification P-elimination (S-DN-P) process was selected for this study. Results indicated that all nutrients were removed by the FBBR process compared with the MBBR process: 19.8% (total COD), 35.5% (filtered COD), 27.6% (BOD(5)), 62.2% (acetate), 78.5% (PO(4)-P), and 54.2% (NO(3)-N) in MBBR; 49.7% (total COD), 54.0% (filtered COD), 63.2% (BOD(5)), 99.6% (acetate), 98.6% (PO(4)-P), and 75.9% (NO(3)-N) in FBBR. The phosphate uptake and NO(3)-N decomposition in the FBBR process during the denitrification phase were much higher than for the MBBR process despite being of shorter duration. Results obtained from this study are helpful in elucidating the practical implications of using MBBR and FBBR for the removal of bio-P and denitrification from wastewater 
650 4 |a Comparative Study 
650 4 |a Journal Article 
650 7 |a Nitrates  |2 NLM 
650 7 |a Phosphates  |2 NLM 
650 7 |a Sewage  |2 NLM 
650 7 |a Water Pollutants, Chemical  |2 NLM 
650 7 |a Oxygen  |2 NLM 
650 7 |a S88TT14065  |2 NLM 
700 1 |a Lee, A H  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Lee, S M  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research  |d 1986  |g 65(2012), 10 vom: 10., Seite 1834-8  |w (DE-627)NLM098149431  |x 0273-1223  |7 nnas 
773 1 8 |g volume:65  |g year:2012  |g number:10  |g day:10  |g pages:1834-8 
856 4 0 |u http://dx.doi.org/10.2166/wst.2012.847  |3 Volltext 
912 |a GBV_USEFLAG_A 
912 |a SYSFLAG_A 
912 |a GBV_NLM 
912 |a GBV_ILN_350 
951 |a AR 
952 |d 65  |j 2012  |e 10  |b 10  |h 1834-8